Dark pathways to achievement in science: researchers' achievement goals predict engagement in questionable research practices

  • Questionable research practices (QRPs) are a strongly debated topic in the scientific community. Hypotheses about the relationship between individual differences and QRPs are plentiful but have rarely been empirically tested. Here, we investigate whether researchers’ personal motivation (expressed by achievement goals) is associated with self-reported engagement in QRPs within a sample of 217 psychology researchers. Appearance approach goals (striving for skill demonstration) positively predicted engagement in QRPs, while learning approach goals (striving for skill development) were a negative predictor. These effects remained stable when also considering Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy in a latent multiple regression model. Additional moderation analyses revealed that the more researchers favored publishing over scientific rigor, the stronger the association between appearance approach goals and engagement in QRPs. The findings deliver first insights into the nature ofQuestionable research practices (QRPs) are a strongly debated topic in the scientific community. Hypotheses about the relationship between individual differences and QRPs are plentiful but have rarely been empirically tested. Here, we investigate whether researchers’ personal motivation (expressed by achievement goals) is associated with self-reported engagement in QRPs within a sample of 217 psychology researchers. Appearance approach goals (striving for skill demonstration) positively predicted engagement in QRPs, while learning approach goals (striving for skill development) were a negative predictor. These effects remained stable when also considering Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy in a latent multiple regression model. Additional moderation analyses revealed that the more researchers favored publishing over scientific rigor, the stronger the association between appearance approach goals and engagement in QRPs. The findings deliver first insights into the nature of the relationship between personal motivation and scientific malpractice.show moreshow less

Download full text files

  • Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer Konsortiallizenz frei zugänglich. / This publication is freely accessible with permission of the rights owner due to a consortial licence.

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Stefan Janke, Martin DaumillerORCiDGND, Selma Carolin Rudert
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-628239
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/62823
ISSN:1948-5506OPAC
ISSN:1948-5514OPAC
Parent Title (English):Social Psychological and Personality Science
Publisher:SAGE Publications
Place of publication:Thousand Oaks [u.a.]
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2019
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2019/09/27
Tag:Clinical Psychology; Social Psychology
Volume:10
Issue:6
First Page:783
Last Page:791
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618790227
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie / Lehrstuhl für Psychologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Licence (German):Deutsches Urheberrecht