Optimal management under institutional constraints: determining a total allowable catch for different fleet segments in the Northeast Arctic cod fishery

  • Many real world fisheries have an individual vessel quota system with restrictions on transferability of quota or entrance of new vessels into the fishery. While the standard economic reasoning is that these institutional constraints lead to welfare losses, the size of those losses and optimal second-best policies are usually unknown. We develop a dynamic bioeconomic model, in which a scientific body provides an optimal TAC given restrictions on (i) transferability between vessel segments and (ii) entrance of new vessels. Further, we also quantify welfare losses arising from not maximizing economic welfare, but physical yield—which is actually the case in many fisheries. We apply the model to the Northeast Arctic cod fishery, and estimate not only the cost and harvesting functions of the various vessel types, but also the parameters of the biological model as well as those of the demand function. This allows us to determine optimal second-best policies and quantify correspondingMany real world fisheries have an individual vessel quota system with restrictions on transferability of quota or entrance of new vessels into the fishery. While the standard economic reasoning is that these institutional constraints lead to welfare losses, the size of those losses and optimal second-best policies are usually unknown. We develop a dynamic bioeconomic model, in which a scientific body provides an optimal TAC given restrictions on (i) transferability between vessel segments and (ii) entrance of new vessels. Further, we also quantify welfare losses arising from not maximizing economic welfare, but physical yield—which is actually the case in many fisheries. We apply the model to the Northeast Arctic cod fishery, and estimate not only the cost and harvesting functions of the various vessel types, but also the parameters of the biological model as well as those of the demand function. This allows us to determine optimal second-best policies and quantify corresponding welfare effects for our case study fishery.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Andries Richter, Anne Maria Eikeset, Daan van Soest, Florian Klaus DiekertORCiDGND, Nils Chr. Stenseth
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1039231
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/103923
ISSN:0924-6460OPAC
ISSN:1573-1502OPAC
Parent Title (English):Environmental and Resource Economics
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2018
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/04/21
Tag:Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law; Economics and Econometrics
Volume:69
Issue:4
First Page:811
Last Page:835
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0106-3
Institutes:Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Fakultätsübergreifende Institute und Einrichtungen
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre
Fakultätsübergreifende Institute und Einrichtungen / Zentrum für Klimaresilienz
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre / Professur für Umweltökonomik
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 63 Landwirtschaft / 630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)