Regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients across the USA

  • Purpose To test for regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients across the USA. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000–2018) was used to tabulate patient (age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor (N stage, sites of metastasis) and treatment characteristics (proportions of nephrectomy and systemic therapy), according to 12 SEER registries. Multinomial regression models, as well as multivariable Cox regression models, tested the overall mortality (OM) adjusting for those patient, tumor and treatment characteristics. Results In 9882 ccmRCC patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 4025 (41%) to 189 (2%). Differences across registries existed for sex (24–36% female), race/ethnicity (1–75% non-Caucasian), N stage (N1 25–35%, NX 3–13%), proportions of nephrectomy (44–63%) and systemic therapy (41–56%). Significant inter-registry differences remained after adjustment for proportions ofPurpose To test for regional differences in clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) patients across the USA. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000–2018) was used to tabulate patient (age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity), tumor (N stage, sites of metastasis) and treatment characteristics (proportions of nephrectomy and systemic therapy), according to 12 SEER registries. Multinomial regression models, as well as multivariable Cox regression models, tested the overall mortality (OM) adjusting for those patient, tumor and treatment characteristics. Results In 9882 ccmRCC patients, registry-specific patient counts ranged from 4025 (41%) to 189 (2%). Differences across registries existed for sex (24–36% female), race/ethnicity (1–75% non-Caucasian), N stage (N1 25–35%, NX 3–13%), proportions of nephrectomy (44–63%) and systemic therapy (41–56%). Significant inter-registry differences remained after adjustment for proportions of nephrectomy (46–63%) and systemic therapy (35–56%). Unadjusted 5-year OM ranged from 73 to 85%. In multivariable analyses, three registries exhibited significantly higher OM (SEER registry 5: hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, p = 0.0001; SEER registry 7:HR 1.15, p = 0.008M SEER registry 10: HR 1.15, p = 0.04), relative to the largest reference registry (n = 4025). Conclusion Important regional differences including patient, tumor and treatment characteristics exist, when ccmRCC patients included in the SEER database are studied. Even after adjustment for these characteristics, important OM differences persisted, which may require more detailed analyses to further investigate these unexpected differences.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Lukas Scheipner, Stefano Tappero, Mattia Luca Piccinelli, Francesco Barletta, Cristina Cano Garcia, Reha-Baris Incesu, Simone Morra, Andrea Baudo, Zhe Tian, Fred Saad, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Carlo Terrone, Ottavio De Cobelli, Alberto Briganti, Felix K. H. Chun, Derya Tilki, Nicola Longo, Luca Carmignani, Martin PichlerORCiDGND, Georg Hutterer, Sascha Ahyai, Pierre I. Karakiewicz
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1087817
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/108781
ISSN:1433-8726OPAC
Parent Title (English):World Journal of Urology
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type:Article
Language:English
Date of first Publication:2023/09/27
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/10/30
Tag:Urology
Volume:41
First Page:2991
Last Page:3000
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04589-4
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Professur für Translationale Krebsforschung
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)