"It's good because he said so" – the effects of pre-service teachers' passive vs. constructive engagement on technology acceptance

  • Pre-service teachers’ rather suboptimal use of technology in teaching may be explained by low levels of technology acceptance. We assumed that encouraging pre-service teachers to constructively engage with information about technology rather than passively reading information about tools should increase their perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU) and intention to use (ITU). N=53 pre-service teachers were either asked to read a blog post about the potential of a mind mapping tool (passive condition) or to work on small tasks that covered the same informational aspects as the blog post (constructive condition). Contrary to our assumptions, reading a blog post significantly contributed to preservice teachers' PEU and PU (in tendency) compared to working constructively on open-ended tasks. The results also suggest that it may be necessary to differentiate between the learning activity that is prompted and the activity that is performed. Possible explanations for thesePre-service teachers’ rather suboptimal use of technology in teaching may be explained by low levels of technology acceptance. We assumed that encouraging pre-service teachers to constructively engage with information about technology rather than passively reading information about tools should increase their perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU) and intention to use (ITU). N=53 pre-service teachers were either asked to read a blog post about the potential of a mind mapping tool (passive condition) or to work on small tasks that covered the same informational aspects as the blog post (constructive condition). Contrary to our assumptions, reading a blog post significantly contributed to preservice teachers' PEU and PU (in tendency) compared to working constructively on open-ended tasks. The results also suggest that it may be necessary to differentiate between the learning activity that is prompted and the activity that is performed. Possible explanations for these effects will be discussed.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Tugce ÖzbekORCiDGND, Christina WekerleORCiDGND, Ingo KollarORCiDGND
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/108920
URL:https://www.dropbox.com/s/ws5sdcfi72aykj1/ICLS2022
ISBN:978-1-7373306-5-3OPAC
ISSN:1573-4552OPAC
Parent Title (English):Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences – ICLS 2022, Hiroshima, Japan, 6-10 June 2022
Publisher:International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS)
Editor:Clark Chinn, Edna Tan, Carol Chan, Yael Kali
Type:Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2022
Release Date:2023/11/13
First Page:456
Last Page:463
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Universität Serviceeinrichtungen
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie / Lehrstuhl für Psychologie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Pädagogischen Psychologie
Universität Serviceeinrichtungen / Zentrum für digitales Lehren und Lernen (DigiLLab)
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 37 Bildung und Erziehung / 370 Bildung und Erziehung