Laser powder bed fusion recoater selection guide: comparison of resulting powder bed properties and part quality

  • Spreading devices used to create powder layers in the laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) were found to have a significant impact on the additive manufacturing process. However, previous research primarily focused on theoretical investigations, including recoater concepts that are not available on the market, while no comprehensive comparison of commercially available spreading devices currently exists. The aim of this study is therefore to examine the powder bed properties and part qualities that can be achieved with the three most common types of recoater: carbon fiber brushes, polymer lips, and high speed steel (HSS) blades. Identical build jobs were produced using each of the spreading devices. Their capabilities were assessed by nine evaluation criteria, including dimensional, metallurgical, and mechanical properties and criticality of particles abraded from the spreading devices. Based on these quantitative findings, a spreading device selection guide was compiled forSpreading devices used to create powder layers in the laser powder bed fusion of metals (PBF-LB/M) were found to have a significant impact on the additive manufacturing process. However, previous research primarily focused on theoretical investigations, including recoater concepts that are not available on the market, while no comprehensive comparison of commercially available spreading devices currently exists. The aim of this study is therefore to examine the powder bed properties and part qualities that can be achieved with the three most common types of recoater: carbon fiber brushes, polymer lips, and high speed steel (HSS) blades. Identical build jobs were produced using each of the spreading devices. Their capabilities were assessed by nine evaluation criteria, including dimensional, metallurgical, and mechanical properties and criticality of particles abraded from the spreading devices. Based on these quantitative findings, a spreading device selection guide was compiled for the benefit of PBF-LB/M practitioners. All recoaters yielded processes with high stability and part properties that were on a par with or even outperformed the nominal values from the literature. However, the HSS blade was found to provide higher accuracy and stability in steady-state processes. In turn, the brush and lip are better suited for parameter development and design studies. Additionally, the lip was found to have economic benefits over the brush, while the brush was deemed an effective all-rounder.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Max Horn, Matthias Schmitt, Lukas Langer, Georg Schlick, Christian Seidel
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1116378
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/111637
ISSN:0032-5910OPAC
Parent Title (English):Powder Technology
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/02/28
Tag:General Chemical Engineering
Volume:434
First Page:119356
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119356
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik / Lehrstuhl für Ingenieurinformatik mit Schwerpunkt Produktionsinformatik
Dewey Decimal Classification:0 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke / 00 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme / 004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)