A comparison of model confidence metrics on visual manufacturing quality data
- After ground-breaking achievements through the application of modern deep learning, there is a considerable push towards using machine learning systems for visual inspection tasks part of most industrial manufacturing processes. But whilst there exist a lot of successful proof-of-concept implementations, productive use proves problematic. Whilst missing interpretability is one concern, the constant presence of data drift is another. Changes in pre-materials or process and degradation of sensors or product redesigns impose constant change towards statically trained machine learning models. To handle these kind of changes, a measurement of system confidence is needed. Since pure model output probabilities often lack in this concern better solutions are required. In this work, we compare and contrast several pre-existing methods used to describe model confidence. In contrast to previous works, they are evaluated on a large set of real-world manufacturing data. It is shown that utilizingAfter ground-breaking achievements through the application of modern deep learning, there is a considerable push towards using machine learning systems for visual inspection tasks part of most industrial manufacturing processes. But whilst there exist a lot of successful proof-of-concept implementations, productive use proves problematic. Whilst missing interpretability is one concern, the constant presence of data drift is another. Changes in pre-materials or process and degradation of sensors or product redesigns impose constant change towards statically trained machine learning models. To handle these kind of changes, a measurement of system confidence is needed. Since pure model output probabilities often lack in this concern better solutions are required. In this work, we compare and contrast several pre-existing methods used to describe model confidence. In contrast to previous works, they are evaluated on a large set of real-world manufacturing data. It is shown that utilizing an approach based on auto-encoder reconstruction error proves to be most promising in all scenarios tested.…
Author: | Philipp MaschaORCiD |
---|---|
Frontdoor URL | https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/115068 |
ISBN: | 9789811978661OPAC |
ISBN: | 9789811978678OPAC |
ISSN: | 2367-3370OPAC |
ISSN: | 2367-3389OPAC |
Parent Title (English): | Computer Vision and Machine Intelligence: proceedings of CVMI 2022 |
Publisher: | Springer Nature |
Place of publication: | Singapore |
Editor: | Massimo Tistarelli, Shiv Ram Dubey, Satish Kumar Singh, Xiaoyi Jiang |
Type: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Year of first Publication: | 2023 |
Release Date: | 2024/09/02 |
First Page: | 165 |
Last Page: | 177 |
Series: | Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ; 586 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7867-8_14 |
Institutes: | Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik |
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik | |
Nachhaltigkeitsziele | |
Nachhaltigkeitsziele / Ziel 9 - Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur | |
Dewey Decimal Classification: | 0 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke / 00 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme / 004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik |