Problem perception and problem regulation during online collaborative learning: what is important for successful collaboration?

  • Background: University students frequently prepare for exams or presentations in self-organized study groups. For this purpose, they often use videoconferencing software. During their collaboration, they need to regulate emerging problems to ensure effective learning. We suppose that regulation is facilitated when (1) the group perceives their regulation problems homogeneously, (2) they choose regulation strategies that have the potential to solve the problems immediately, and (3) they execute these strategies with sufficient intensity. Aims: We investigated which problems occur during online collaborative learning via videoconferencing and how homogeneity of problem perceptions, immediacy of the chosen strategies, and intensity of strategy use are related to regulation success. Sample: University students (N = 222) from two lectures in pre-service teacher education and educational sciences in 99 study groups. Methods: Students collaborated in a self-organized manner, that is,Background: University students frequently prepare for exams or presentations in self-organized study groups. For this purpose, they often use videoconferencing software. During their collaboration, they need to regulate emerging problems to ensure effective learning. We suppose that regulation is facilitated when (1) the group perceives their regulation problems homogeneously, (2) they choose regulation strategies that have the potential to solve the problems immediately, and (3) they execute these strategies with sufficient intensity. Aims: We investigated which problems occur during online collaborative learning via videoconferencing and how homogeneity of problem perceptions, immediacy of the chosen strategies, and intensity of strategy use are related to regulation success. Sample: University students (N = 222) from two lectures in pre-service teacher education and educational sciences in 99 study groups. Methods: Students collaborated in a self-organized manner, that is, without a teacher present, to study the material of one lecture using videoconferencing software. After the collaboration, group members rated, individually, the intensity of different problems during collaboration, reported which strategies they used to overcome their biggest problem, and rated the success of their problem regulation, their satisfaction with their collaboration, as well as their learning gain. In addition, they answered a knowledge test. Results: We found that most students rated technical issues as their biggest problem. Multilevel modeling showed that homogeneous problem perception moderated by problem intensity—contrary to immediate and intensive strategy use—predicted successful problem regulation and satisfaction with the collaboration but not knowledge gain. Case analyses illustrate the assumed mechanism that a homogeneous problem perception facilitates socially shared regulation. Conclusion: We conclude that even in only slightly structured learning contexts, students might only need to jointly identify their problems, whereas the best possible regulation of these problems seems less relevant. Therefore, training students to foster regulation competencies might prioritize identifying problems.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Martin GreiselORCiDGND, Laura SpangORCiDGND, Kerstin Fett, Ingo KollarORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1156333
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/115633
ISSN:1664-1078OPAC
Parent Title (English):Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher:Frontiers
Place of publication:Lausanne
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/10/01
Tag:Kollaboratives Lernen; Selbstgesteuertes Lernen; Computerunterstütztes Lernen
collaborative learning; socially shared regulation; challenges; homogeneity; videoconferencing
Volume:15
First Page:1351723
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1351723
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie / Lehrstuhl für Psychologie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Pädagogischen Psychologie
Nachhaltigkeitsziele
Nachhaltigkeitsziele / Ziel 4 - Hochwertige Bildung
Dewey Decimal Classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)