Analysing the influence of reorder strategies for Cartesian Genetic Programming

  • Cartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) suffers from a specific limitation: Positional bias, a phenomenon in which mostly genes at the start of the genome contribute to a program output, while genes at the end rarely do. This can lead to an overall worse performance of CGP. One solution to overcome positional bias is to introduce reordering methods, which shuffle the current genotype without changing its corresponding phenotype. There are currently two different reorder operators that extend the classic CGP formula and improve its fitness value. In this work, we discuss possible shortcomings of these two existing operators. Afterwards, we introduce three novel operators which reorder the genotype of a graph defined by CGP. We show empirically on four Boolean and four symbolic regression benchmarks that the number of iterations until a solution is found and/or the fitness value improves by using CGP with a reorder method. However, there is no consistently best performing reorderCartesian Genetic Programming (CGP) suffers from a specific limitation: Positional bias, a phenomenon in which mostly genes at the start of the genome contribute to a program output, while genes at the end rarely do. This can lead to an overall worse performance of CGP. One solution to overcome positional bias is to introduce reordering methods, which shuffle the current genotype without changing its corresponding phenotype. There are currently two different reorder operators that extend the classic CGP formula and improve its fitness value. In this work, we discuss possible shortcomings of these two existing operators. Afterwards, we introduce three novel operators which reorder the genotype of a graph defined by CGP. We show empirically on four Boolean and four symbolic regression benchmarks that the number of iterations until a solution is found and/or the fitness value improves by using CGP with a reorder method. However, there is no consistently best performing reorder operator. Furthermore, their behaviour is analysed by investigating their convergence plots and we show that all behave the same in terms of convergence type.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Henning CuiORCiDGND, Andreas MargrafORCiD, Jörg HähnerORCiDGND
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/115650
URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00518
Parent Title (English):arXiv
Type:Preprint
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/10/02
Tag:Cartesian Genetic Programming; CGP; Reorder
First Page:1
Last Page:26
DOI:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.00518
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik / Lehrstuhl für Organic Computing
Dewey Decimal Classification:0 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke / 00 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme / 004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Latest Publications (not yet published in print):Aktuelle Publikationen (noch nicht gedruckt erschienen)
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)