The weaknesses of the sale of goods directive – dealing with legislative deficits

  • The South African legislator frequently employs a comparative approach, importing European and Anglo-American legal solutions. These doo not necessarily fit into the existing South African legal system. Similar developments can be observed in German law; it is increasingly influenced by European law. This applies in particular to the German Civil Code. In 2019, the European legislatur adopted the Sale of Goods Directive and the Digital Conent Directive. As stated in the first article of each of these two directives, the aim is to ensure a "proper" functioning of the internal market. The adoption of both directives follows full harmonisation; it creates a uniform legal framework, as Member States are not allowed to maaintain or introduce diverging provisions. This paper seekes to combine the sale of goods law with a number of questions on European Legal methodology.

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Thomas M. J. MöllersORCiDGND, Lisa WolfGND
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/118676
ISBN:9783748945253OPAC
Parent Title (English):On the fourth industrial revolution: legal perspectives from Germany and South Africa
Publisher:Nomos
Place of publication:Baden-Baden
Editor:Thomas M. J. MöllersORCiDGND, Kathleen van der Linde
Type:Part of a Book
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Release Date:2025/01/29
First Page:189
Last Page:220
Series:Augsburger Rechtsstudien ; 94
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748945253-189
Institutes:Juristische Fakultät
Juristische Fakultät / Institut für Zivilrecht
Juristische Fakultät / Institut für Zivilrecht / Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Europarecht, Internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht