Land use/land cover changes due to gold mining in the Singida region, central Tanzania: environmental and socio-economic implications

  • This study explored the land use and land cover (LULC) changes (1995–2023) in the gold mining hotspots of Mang’onyi, Sambaru, and Londoni in the Singida region of Tanzania. The study integrated remote sensing (RS) to evaluate the LULC transitions with social survey assessments (83 respondents) to determine the resident’s perceptions of the environmental, social, and economic implications of mining bridging technical data with socio-economic realities. Supervised classification of Landsat images was conducted using the random forest (RF) classifier to generate LULC maps with five classes (bareland, agricultural land, forest, built-up, and shrubs and grasses), followed by an analysis to identify LULC change trends. The results showed an overall increase in agricultural land 168.51 km2 (587.55%), bareland 7.70 km2 (121.45%), and built-up areas 0.55 km2 (134.15%), while forest and shrubs and grasses areas declined by 97.67 km2 (− 72.59%) and 79.09 km2 (− 43.49%), respectively. A socialThis study explored the land use and land cover (LULC) changes (1995–2023) in the gold mining hotspots of Mang’onyi, Sambaru, and Londoni in the Singida region of Tanzania. The study integrated remote sensing (RS) to evaluate the LULC transitions with social survey assessments (83 respondents) to determine the resident’s perceptions of the environmental, social, and economic implications of mining bridging technical data with socio-economic realities. Supervised classification of Landsat images was conducted using the random forest (RF) classifier to generate LULC maps with five classes (bareland, agricultural land, forest, built-up, and shrubs and grasses), followed by an analysis to identify LULC change trends. The results showed an overall increase in agricultural land 168.51 km2 (587.55%), bareland 7.70 km2 (121.45%), and built-up areas 0.55 km2 (134.15%), while forest and shrubs and grasses areas declined by 97.67 km2 (− 72.59%) and 79.09 km2 (− 43.49%), respectively. A social survey assessment revealed residents perceived environmental (deforestation, biodiversity loss, land degradation, water, air, soil pollution), social (occupational hazards, land use conflicts, negative effects on livelihoods and culture, discrimination, child labor, community displacement), and economic (improved housing, infrastructural development, job creation, economy boost, improved access to services) impacts resulting from mining activities. Our findings underscore the importance of balancing the economic benefits of gold mining with the imperative to protect the environment and support sustainable livelihoods in the mining regions.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Azaria Stephano Lameck, Brian Rotich, Abdalrahman Ahmed, Harison K. KipkuleiORCiDGND, Silvester Raymond Mnyawi, Kornel Czimber
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1211221
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/121122
ISSN:1573-2959OPAC
Parent Title (English):Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Place of publication:Berlin
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/04/03
Volume:197
Issue:4
First Page:464
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-13921-x
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie / Lehrstuhl für Klimaresilienz von Kulturökosystemen
Dewey Decimal Classification:9 Geschichte und Geografie / 91 Geografie, Reisen / 910 Geografie, Reisen
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)