Practices of contradicting in networked publics: a proposal for understanding social conflictual dynamics

  • This article proposes a research heuristic to analyse practices of contradicting in networked publics. This heuristic is based on the thesis of the polarization of society, as witnessed in the media discourse, and the approach of a political sociology of conflict. Such an approach requires developing theories in communication and media studies to document social conflict dynamics in changing public dynamics, explain dominant communicative practices, and to interpret subsequent developments. The research heuristic presented here prefers an approach rooted in praxeology and as such makes it possible to analyse practices of contradiction in networked publics, leading to observations informed by theories of public sphere. This approach is particularly relevant in ongoing debates on gender relations, sexualized harassment, and violence, all of which have once again become ‘trigger points’ that are challenging individuals and institutions of modern societies on different levels. The debateThis article proposes a research heuristic to analyse practices of contradicting in networked publics. This heuristic is based on the thesis of the polarization of society, as witnessed in the media discourse, and the approach of a political sociology of conflict. Such an approach requires developing theories in communication and media studies to document social conflict dynamics in changing public dynamics, explain dominant communicative practices, and to interpret subsequent developments. The research heuristic presented here prefers an approach rooted in praxeology and as such makes it possible to analyse practices of contradiction in networked publics, leading to observations informed by theories of public sphere. This approach is particularly relevant in ongoing debates on gender relations, sexualized harassment, and violence, all of which have once again become ‘trigger points’ that are challenging individuals and institutions of modern societies on different levels. The debate about the accusations against Till Lindemann as the lead singer of the internationally renowned German band Rammstein, a debate that has garnered attention beyond the German-speaking contexts, illustrates how this proposed research heuristic can become a tool for an informed analysis.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Margreth Lünenborg, Tanja Thomas, Dagmar Hoffmann, Susanne KinnebrockORCiDGND, Susanne Eichner
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1214704
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/121470
ISSN:0033-4006OPAC
ISSN:1862-2569OPAC
Parent Title (German):Publizistik
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Place of publication:Berlin
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/04/17
Volume:70
First Page:47
Last Page:72
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-025-00873-y
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / imwk - Institut für Medien, Wissen und Kommunikation
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / imwk - Institut für Medien, Wissen und Kommunikation / Professur für Kommunikationswissenschaft mit Schwerpunkt Öffentliche Kommunikation
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)