What difference does Foucault's discourse analysis make? Why discourse analysis needs to be based on the concepts of historical epistemology

  • Michel Foucault’s neostructural discourse analysis was developed in the context of the socalled »historical epistemology« (or »French epistemology«). The argument of this contribution is that discourse analysis needs to be based on the core concepts of historical epistemology. These can be conceived of as methodological concepts for Foucault’s discourse analysis. The main concepts as epistemological break, epistemological obstacle and phenomenotechnology are introduced and related to discourse analysis. One consequence is the need of a specific form of hermeneutics, which has to be different from subjectivist and phenomenological forms of interpretation is emphasized. Also, the critique against historical epistemology in France articulated by Bruno Latour as well as the defense of historical epistemology as formulated by Mary Tiles and Pierre Bourdieu is presented. The need for self-objectivation and self-reflection of discourse analysis as method and practice is introduced. TheMichel Foucault’s neostructural discourse analysis was developed in the context of the socalled »historical epistemology« (or »French epistemology«). The argument of this contribution is that discourse analysis needs to be based on the core concepts of historical epistemology. These can be conceived of as methodological concepts for Foucault’s discourse analysis. The main concepts as epistemological break, epistemological obstacle and phenomenotechnology are introduced and related to discourse analysis. One consequence is the need of a specific form of hermeneutics, which has to be different from subjectivist and phenomenological forms of interpretation is emphasized. Also, the critique against historical epistemology in France articulated by Bruno Latour as well as the defense of historical epistemology as formulated by Mary Tiles and Pierre Bourdieu is presented. The need for self-objectivation and self-reflection of discourse analysis as method and practice is introduced. The article concludes that, so far, outside of France the main methodological positions of Foucault’s discourse analysis have not been successfully established.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Rainer Diaz-Bone
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1233879
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/123387
URL:https://www.uni-augsburg.de/de/fakultaet/philsoz/fakultat/soziologie/zfd/
ISSN:2195-867XOPAC
Parent Title (Multiple languages):Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung / Journal for Discourse Studies
Publisher:Beltz Juventa
Place of publication:Weinheim
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2022
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/07/08
Volume:10
Issue:2
First Page:217
Last Page:226
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3262/ZFD2202217
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften
Licence (German):Deutsches Urheberrecht