Open Access

Sophie Meesters, Sukhvir Kaur, Viola Milke, Christin Herrmann, Aneta Schieferdecker, Nikolas Oubaid, Karin Oechsle, Holger Schulz, Holger Pfaff, Raymond Voltz, Kerstin Kremeike

• Objectives: The hospital setting is often perceived as slow to change. While employee-driven approaches offer a promising alternative to traditional top-down methods, guidance is limited. This study provides a description and formative evaluation of an employee-driven working group (WG) approach to tailor ward-specific measures to improve care in the dying phase. The aim is to evaluate the WG process and offer practical insights for transferability to other hospitals. Methods: Formative mixed-methods evaluation of a WG process to tailor ward-specific evidence-informed measures on 10 wards outside specialized palliative care at 2 German medical centers. To analyze factors relevant for the WG process, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0 was applied. Data included baseline evaluation (medical record analysis, staff survey and focus groups, informal caregiver interviews), WG protocols, and an online survey with WG participants. Results: Multiprofessional WGsObjectives: The hospital setting is often perceived as slow to change. While employee-driven approaches offer a promising alternative to traditional top-down methods, guidance is limited. This study provides a description and formative evaluation of an employee-driven working group (WG) approach to tailor ward-specific measures to improve care in the dying phase. The aim is to evaluate the WG process and offer practical insights for transferability to other hospitals. Methods: Formative mixed-methods evaluation of a WG process to tailor ward-specific evidence-informed measures on 10 wards outside specialized palliative care at 2 German medical centers. To analyze factors relevant for the WG process, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0 was applied. Data included baseline evaluation (medical record analysis, staff survey and focus groups, informal caregiver interviews), WG protocols, and an online survey with WG participants. Results: Multiprofessional WGs were established on all hospital wards, with an average of 7 meetings per ward within 1 year and 4 participants per meeting. Adapting the process to participants' wishes and needs were crucial, particularly regarding the desired degree of external input. We identified 4 barriers (e.g. declining participation, institutional limits) and 7 facilitators (e.g. involvement of staff in leading positions, multiprofessional composition). The WGs tailored 34 measures, e.g. team meetings to improve communication within the team. Participants' views were generally positive: 91% felt able to share their thoughts, 66% were satisfied with the outcome, and 77% would participate again. Significance of results: The employee-driven approach was feasible and useful for tailoring ward-specific measures. However, integrating top-down elements proved to be beneficial. The identified barriers and facilitators provide insights for transferring an employee-driven approach to other hospitals to improve care in the dying phase outside specialized palliative care settings. Clinical trial registration: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00025405).…