Rapid flood mapping from aerial imagery using fine-tuned SAM and ResNet-backboned U-Net

  • Flooding is a major natural hazard that requires a rapid response to minimize the loss of life and property and to facilitate damage assessment. Aerial imagery, especially images from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and helicopters, plays a crucial role in identifying areas affected by flooding. Therefore, developing an efficient model for rapid flood mapping is essential. In this study, we present two segmentation approaches for the mapping of flood-affected areas: (1) a fine-tuned Segment Anything Model (SAM), comparing the performance of point prompts versus bounding box prompts, and (2) a U-Net model with ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 as pre-trained backbones. Our results showed that the fine-tuned SAM performed best in segmenting floods with point prompts (Accuracy: 0.96, IoU: 0.90), while bounding box prompts led to a significant drop (Accuracy: 0.82, IoU: 0.67). This is because flood images often cover the image from edge to edge, making bounding box prompts less effective atFlooding is a major natural hazard that requires a rapid response to minimize the loss of life and property and to facilitate damage assessment. Aerial imagery, especially images from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and helicopters, plays a crucial role in identifying areas affected by flooding. Therefore, developing an efficient model for rapid flood mapping is essential. In this study, we present two segmentation approaches for the mapping of flood-affected areas: (1) a fine-tuned Segment Anything Model (SAM), comparing the performance of point prompts versus bounding box prompts, and (2) a U-Net model with ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 as pre-trained backbones. Our results showed that the fine-tuned SAM performed best in segmenting floods with point prompts (Accuracy: 0.96, IoU: 0.90), while bounding box prompts led to a significant drop (Accuracy: 0.82, IoU: 0.67). This is because flood images often cover the image from edge to edge, making bounding box prompts less effective at capturing boundary details. For the U-Net model, the ResNet-50 backbone yielded an accuracy of 0.87 and an IoU of 0.72. Performance improved slightly with the ResNet-101 backbone, achieving an accuracy of 0.88 and an IoU of 0.74. This improvement can be attributed to the deeper architecture of ResNet-101, which allows more complex and detailed features to be extracted, improving U-Net's ability to segment flood-affected areas accurately. The results of this study will help emergency response teams identify flood-affected areas more quickly and accurately. In addition, these models could serve as valuable tools for insurance companies when assessing damage. Moreover, the segmented flood images generated by these models can serve as training data for other machine learning models, creating a pipeline for more advanced flood analysis and prediction systems.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Hadi Shokati, Kay D. SeufferheldORCiDGND, Peter FienerORCiDGND, Thomas Scholten
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1280544
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/128054
ISSN:1607-7938OPAC
Parent Title (English):Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Publisher:Copernicus
Place of publication:Göttingen
Type:Article
Language:English
Date of first Publication:2026/02/09
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2026/03/02
Volume:30
Issue:3
First Page:743
Last Page:756
DOI:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-743-2026
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie / Professur für Wasser- und Bodenressourcenforschung
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 55 Geowissenschaften, Geologie / 550 Geowissenschaften
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung