Value of a repeat 18F-flotufolastat PET scan following a negative scan in patients with suspected biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

  • Purpose To investigate the potential of a second 18F-flotufolastat positron emission tomography (PET) scan in patients with suspected biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) who had a previous negative 18F-flotufolastat PET, and to identify prostate-specific antigen (PSA) parameters influencing detection efficacy. Methods Our retrospective analysis included data from patients who underwent second 18F-flotufolastat PET between 2019 and 2024, following negative 18F-flotufolastat PET for suspected BCR of PCa (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy. Two board-certified experts classified 18F-flotufolastat-avid lesions per miTNM categories. Patient-level detection rates were stratified by: pre-PET scan PSA; absolute/relative difference in PSA (ΔPSA) between negative first and second PET; PSA velocity (PSAvel); PSA doubling time (PSAdt). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Results Of 101 patients (median age = 70 years; medianPurpose To investigate the potential of a second 18F-flotufolastat positron emission tomography (PET) scan in patients with suspected biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) who had a previous negative 18F-flotufolastat PET, and to identify prostate-specific antigen (PSA) parameters influencing detection efficacy. Methods Our retrospective analysis included data from patients who underwent second 18F-flotufolastat PET between 2019 and 2024, following negative 18F-flotufolastat PET for suspected BCR of PCa (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy. Two board-certified experts classified 18F-flotufolastat-avid lesions per miTNM categories. Patient-level detection rates were stratified by: pre-PET scan PSA; absolute/relative difference in PSA (ΔPSA) between negative first and second PET; PSA velocity (PSAvel); PSA doubling time (PSAdt). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Results Of 101 patients (median age = 70 years; median PSA = 0.79 ng/mL), 58 (57%) had a positive second 18F-flotufolastat scan. Detection rates increased with PSA level, ΔPSA, PSAvel, and PSAdt. Differences in PSA level, ΔPSA, PSAvel, and PSAdt between groups with/without suspicious 18F-flotufolastat uptake were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Cut-offs for statistically optimal trade-off between negative and positive second PET (ROC analyses) were: PSA level > 0.82 ng/mL; absolute ΔPSA > 0.50 ng/mL; relative ΔPSA > + 100%; PSAvel > 0.30 ng/mL/y; PSAdt ≤ 17 months. Conclusion In over half of patients presenting with BCR after radical prostatectomy and an initial negative 18F-flotufolastat PET, second 18F-flotufolastat PET identified recurrent lesions. PSA level at time of second PET, absolute/relative ΔPSA, PSAvel, and PSAdt influenced scan positivity.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Sonja Kirchhoff, Andreas Lederer, Theo Lorenzini, Michael Gammel, Daniel Sasse, Matthias HeckORCiDGND, Bernhard Haller, Wolfgang A. Weber, Matthias Eiber, Isabel Rauscher
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1283232
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/128323
ISSN:1619-7070OPAC
ISSN:1619-7089OPAC
Parent Title (English):European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Place of publication:Berlin
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2026
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2026/02/27
Volume:53
Issue:8
First Page:4862
Last Page:4872
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-07786-6
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Urologie (Heck)
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung