Using technology to promote student learning? An analysis of pre- and in-service teachers' lesson plans

  • Technology may promote student engagement in high-level learning processes in the classroom. Yet, whether teachers really exploit technology’s potential to support student learning depends on their expertise. The authors compared pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers’ reasoning about technology-enhanced lessons by means of lesson plans. The authors assumed that technology-experienced teachers’ lesson plans would target more high-level learning activities than those of pre-service teachers. They asked N = 134 pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers to plan an ideal technology-enhanced classroom lesson. The teachers were requested to report the types of learning activities they would have students engage in, both during technology-enhanced and non-technology-enhanced lesson activities. As assumed, in-service teachers were more likely to include higher-level technology-enhanced learning activities than pre-service teachers. However, the authorsTechnology may promote student engagement in high-level learning processes in the classroom. Yet, whether teachers really exploit technology’s potential to support student learning depends on their expertise. The authors compared pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers’ reasoning about technology-enhanced lessons by means of lesson plans. The authors assumed that technology-experienced teachers’ lesson plans would target more high-level learning activities than those of pre-service teachers. They asked N = 134 pre-service and technology-experienced in-service teachers to plan an ideal technology-enhanced classroom lesson. The teachers were requested to report the types of learning activities they would have students engage in, both during technology-enhanced and non-technology-enhanced lesson activities. As assumed, in-service teachers were more likely to include higher-level technology-enhanced learning activities than pre-service teachers. However, the authors found no differences for non-technology-enhanced learning activities. Based on these findings and further qualitative analyses, implications for curriculum design are drawn.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Christina WekerleORCiDGND, Ingo KollarORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-963134
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/96313
ISSN:1475-939XOPAC
Parent Title (English):Technology Pedagogy and Education
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2022
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2022/06/27
Volume:31
Issue:5
First Page:597
Last Page:614
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2083669
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Universität Serviceeinrichtungen
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie / Lehrstuhl für Psychologie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Pädagogischen Psychologie
Universität Serviceeinrichtungen / Zentrum für digitales Lehren und Lernen (DigiLLab)
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 37 Bildung und Erziehung / 370 Bildung und Erziehung
Licence (German):CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung (mit Print on Demand)