Who justifies questionable reporting practices? Answers from a representative survey of journalists in Germany
- Based on a secondary analysis of representative survey data of journalists in Germany (n= 1536), this paper draws attention to two variables that are important when it comes to explain whether journalists accept questionable reporting practices, such as paying people to obtain information or using confidential government documents without permission. First, perceived role achievement is important, as journalists who do not feel able to achieve an active role tend to accept questionable reporting practices more often. Second, however, this relationship is only true for journalists having a moderate tendency to the political left. Findings are explained by means of the theory of cognitive dissonance.
Download full text files
Statistics
Print On Demand
Additional Services
| Author: | Philip Baugut, Sebastian ScherrORCiDGND |
|---|---|
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-978043 |
| Frontdoor URL | https://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/97804 |
| URL: | https://www.globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/article/view/38 |
| Parent Title (English): | Global Media Journal - German Edition |
| Type: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Year of first Publication: | 2017 |
| Publishing Institution: | Universität Augsburg |
| Release Date: | 2022/09/05 |
| Volume: | 7 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Institutes: | Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät |
| Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / imwk - Institut für Medien, Wissen und Kommunikation | |
| Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / imwk - Institut für Medien, Wissen und Kommunikation / Lehrstuhl für Digital Health Communication | |
| Dewey Decimal Classification: | 3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften |
| Licence (German): |  CC-BY-NC 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell (mit Print on Demand) |
