• search hit 1 of 10
Back to Result List

Sex differences in guideline adherence for coronary angiography in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome in Germany: insights from the ENLIGHT-KHK trial

  • Background For the management of acute coronary syndrome, literature shows lower healthcare providers’ guideline adherence for women than for men. Since less is known about the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), this study investigated patient-related sex differences in providers’ guideline adherence for invasive coronary angiography (CA) performed in patients with suspected CCS. Methods Using data from the German ENLIGHT-KHK trial, patients with suspected CCS who underwent a CA were analysed. To assess the association between patient sex and physicians’ adherence to the German National Disease Management Guideline “Chronic coronary artery disease” of 2019, binary logistic regression models were developed. Covariates included age, symptoms, risk factors, comorbidities, and non-invasive testing and its results. To examine sex differences in predictors of guideline adherence, models were run separately for women and men. Results Two hundred seventy-three women andBackground For the management of acute coronary syndrome, literature shows lower healthcare providers’ guideline adherence for women than for men. Since less is known about the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), this study investigated patient-related sex differences in providers’ guideline adherence for invasive coronary angiography (CA) performed in patients with suspected CCS. Methods Using data from the German ENLIGHT-KHK trial, patients with suspected CCS who underwent a CA were analysed. To assess the association between patient sex and physicians’ adherence to the German National Disease Management Guideline “Chronic coronary artery disease” of 2019, binary logistic regression models were developed. Covariates included age, symptoms, risk factors, comorbidities, and non-invasive testing and its results. To examine sex differences in predictors of guideline adherence, models were run separately for women and men. Results Two hundred seventy-three women and three hundred eighty-six men were included (aged 67 ± 10 years). Physicians’ guideline adherence for CA was lower for women than for men (19.4% vs. 30.1%, p = 0.002). CAs were less likely to be guideline-adherent for women with suspected CCS than men (OR 0.4, p < 0.05). Guideline adherence predictors differed between women and men. For example, men’s predictors included non-invasive testing and its results, age, typical angina and smoking; of these, only a positive non-invasive test result had an impact for women. Conclusion Our results indicate a less guideline-adherent diagnostic workup of CA for women with suspected CCS than men. This might reflect a limited awareness of CCS in women and insufficiently sex-specific guideline recommendations. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00015638, Registered February 19, 2019; Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1227-8055.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Hannah Kentenich, Arim Shukri, Dirk Müller, Bastian WeinORCiDGND, Oliver Bruder, Stephanie Stock, Yana Kampfer
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/121980
ISSN:1861-0684OPAC
ISSN:1861-0692OPAC
Parent Title (English):Clinical Research in Cardiology
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/05/15
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02655-y
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Latest Publications (not yet published in print):Aktuelle Publikationen (noch nicht gedruckt erschienen)
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)