Laura L. Michel, Philipp Ziegler, Philipp Kreis, Andreas D. Hartkopf, Markus Wallwiener, Lothar Häberle, Nelson John, Hans-Christian Kolberg, Peyman Hadji, Hans Tesch, Johannes Ettl, Diana Lüftner, Volkmar Müller, Erik Belleville, Pauline Wimberger, Hans-Martin Enzinger, Hanna Huebner, Sabrina Uhrig, Carolin C. Hack, Petra Krabisch, Peter A. Fasching, Rachel Wuerstlein, Michael Untch, Nina Ditsch, Alexander Hein, Wolfgang Janni, Florin-Andrei Taran, Michael P. Lux, Diethelm Wallwiener, Sara Y. Brucker, Tanja N. Fehm, Andreas Schneeweiss, Chloë Goossens, Tobias Engler
- Introduction
Whereas CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are the standard first-line therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos), HER2-negative (HER2neg) metastatic breast cancer, guidelines on treatment options after progression on CDK4/6i are more diverse. Chemotherapy is recommended if a patient develops endocrine resistance or experiences a visceral crisis. However, the impact of the choice of chemotherapy remains unknown.
Methods
HRpos/HER2neg patients who received first-line CDK4/6i, followed by second-line chemotherapy (N = 215) were selected from the prospective PRAEGNANT registry (NCT02338167). Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between the choice of chemotherapy (capecitabine monotherapy, capecitabine + bevacizumab, taxane monotherapy, taxane + bevacizumab, anthracycline, other chemotherapeutics) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Patients who received second-line chemotherapy mostly had high-gradeIntroduction
Whereas CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are the standard first-line therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos), HER2-negative (HER2neg) metastatic breast cancer, guidelines on treatment options after progression on CDK4/6i are more diverse. Chemotherapy is recommended if a patient develops endocrine resistance or experiences a visceral crisis. However, the impact of the choice of chemotherapy remains unknown.
Methods
HRpos/HER2neg patients who received first-line CDK4/6i, followed by second-line chemotherapy (N = 215) were selected from the prospective PRAEGNANT registry (NCT02338167). Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the correlation between the choice of chemotherapy (capecitabine monotherapy, capecitabine + bevacizumab, taxane monotherapy, taxane + bevacizumab, anthracycline, other chemotherapeutics) and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
Patients who received second-line chemotherapy mostly had high-grade tumors (G2: 62.3 %, G3: 33.3 %), visceral metastases (62.3 %) and developed metastatic disease following a primary breast cancer diagnosis (73.8 %). Capecitabine was the most common regimen (25.1 %), followed by taxane + bevacizumab (17.2 %). When adjusting for other prognostic factors (age, BMI, grading, ECOG, metastasis group and time to metastases), the choice of chemotherapy did not influence PFS (p = 0.16) nor OS (p = 0.47). Adjusted hazard ratios for PFS were lowest in regimens with bevacizumab (capecitabine as reference; capecitabine + bevacizumab: 0.53 (95 %CI: 0.29, 0.97); taxane + bevacizumab: 0.64 (95 %CI 0.35, 1.15)).
Conclusion
Although the choice of chemotherapy post-CDK4/6i did not significantly affect PFS or OS, combinations with bevacizumab may have some benefit. Nevertheless, considering side effects may be most important when choosing the type of second-line chemotherapy.…
