• search hit 7 of 14
Back to Result List

Statistics for model calibration

  • Mathematical models of dynamic processes contain parameters which have to be estimated based on time-resolved experimental data. This task is often approached by optimization of a suitably chosen objective function. Maximization of the likelihood, i.e. maximum likelihood estimation, has several beneficial theoretical properties ensuring efficient and accurate statistical analyses and is therefore often performed for identification of model parameters. For nonlinear models, optimization is challenging and advanced numerical techniques have been established to approach this issue. However, the statistical methodology typically applied to interpret the optimization outcomes often still rely on linear approximations of the likelihood. In this review, we summarize the maximum likelihood methodology and focus on nonlinear models like ordinary differential equations. The profile likelihood methodology is utilized to derive confidence intervals and for performing identifiability andMathematical models of dynamic processes contain parameters which have to be estimated based on time-resolved experimental data. This task is often approached by optimization of a suitably chosen objective function. Maximization of the likelihood, i.e. maximum likelihood estimation, has several beneficial theoretical properties ensuring efficient and accurate statistical analyses and is therefore often performed for identification of model parameters. For nonlinear models, optimization is challenging and advanced numerical techniques have been established to approach this issue. However, the statistical methodology typically applied to interpret the optimization outcomes often still rely on linear approximations of the likelihood. In this review, we summarize the maximum likelihood methodology and focus on nonlinear models like ordinary differential equations. The profile likelihood methodology is utilized to derive confidence intervals and for performing identifiability and observability analyses.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Clemens Kreutz, Andreas RaueORCiDGND, Jens Timmer
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/113224
ISBN:9783319233208OPAC
ISBN:9783319233215OPAC
ISSN:2191-303XOPAC
ISSN:2191-3048OPAC
Parent Title (English):Multiple shooting and time domain decomposition methods: MuS-TDD, Heidelberg, May 6-8, 2013
Publisher:Springer
Place of publication:Cham
Editor:Thomas Carraro, Michael Geiger, Stefan Körkel, Rolf Rannacher
Type:Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2015
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/06/03
First Page:355
Last Page:375
Series:Contributions in Mathematical and Computational Sciences ; 9
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23321-5_14
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik / Lehrstuhl für Modellierung und Simulation biologischer Prozesse
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit