• search hit 51 of 189
Back to Result List

Experiences of general practice teams and their patients with clinical research — a mixed-methods process evaluation of the Bavarian Research Practice Network (BayFoNet)

  • Background Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have been implemented to support clinical research in German general practice since 2020. General practitioners (GPs) are often critical concerning the feasibility of clinical trials. Among others, high workload, lack of resources in GP teams and little acceptance of the trial requirements by the patients are assumed barriers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of the GP teams and their patients on the set up of BayFoNet during the implementation of the two pilot cluster-randomized trials to improve this collaboration on a sustainable basis. Methods GPs and medical assistants (MAs) were interviewed using semi-structured interviews based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation research and verbatim transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Patient attitudes were evaluated quantitatively with questionnaires based on the theoretical domainsBackground Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have been implemented to support clinical research in German general practice since 2020. General practitioners (GPs) are often critical concerning the feasibility of clinical trials. Among others, high workload, lack of resources in GP teams and little acceptance of the trial requirements by the patients are assumed barriers. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the perspectives of the GP teams and their patients on the set up of BayFoNet during the implementation of the two pilot cluster-randomized trials to improve this collaboration on a sustainable basis. Methods GPs and medical assistants (MAs) were interviewed using semi-structured interviews based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation research and verbatim transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Patient attitudes were evaluated quantitatively with questionnaires based on the theoretical domains framework using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 15 GPs and 15 MAs were interviewed, and 109 complete patient questionnaires were returned. Main facilitators for GPs’ active participation in clinical research were networking as well as active participation of GP teams at different levels of the research process. Increased awareness concerning PBRNs might promote a lively network. From the GPs’ perspective, lack of motivation among MAs and patients was a perceived barrier to support clinical research in general practice. MAs emphasized their own increase in knowledge and competence as well as the importance of clinical research for improved patient care. In contrast to the GPs, most MAs were not aware of BayFoNet as a network structure. The surveyed patients rated their own capabilities and opportunities to actively participate in the pilot studies as very good. Prior to the implementations of the interventions, some patients experienced some difficulty in defining clear goals for their own participation. Discussion Increased awareness concerning PBRNs might promote a lively network. Target-group specific dissemination strategies as well as opportunities for GP teams and their patients to participate in clinical research should be elaborated. This might increase the feasibility of clinical trials and the motivation of all participants to conduct clinical trials in general practice. Trial registration Pilot cluster-randomized trial 1 (MicUTI) was prospectively registered on December 19, 2022 at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05667207); Pilot cluster-randomized trial 2 (IMONEDA) was prospectively registered on April 22, 2022 at www.bfarm.de (DRKS00028805).show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Linda Sanftenberg, Anna-Lena Schnaidt, Stefanie Eck, Antonius Schneider, Eva Bucher, Peter Konstantin Kurotschka, Ildikó Gágyor, Merle Klanke, Stefanie Stark, Thomas Kühlein, Fabian Walter, Marco Roos, Tobias Dreischulte, Jochen Gensichen, Andrea Baumgärtel, Tobias Dreischulte, Stefanie Eck, Kathrin Lasher, Maike Ermster, Ildikó Gágyor, Jochen Gensichen, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Susann Hueber, Merle Klanke, Christian Kretzschmann, Thomas Kühlein, Peter Konstantin Kurotschka, Klaus Linde, Klara Lorenz, Marco RoosORCiDGND, Linda Sanftenberg, Antonius Schneider, Stefanie Stark, Til Uebel, Clara Teusen, Fabian Walter
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1210197
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/121019
ISSN:2731-4553OPAC
Parent Title (English):BMC Primary Care
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/04/10
Volume:26
Issue:1
First Page:59
Note:
Published for the BayFoNet study group.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02744-x
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Allgemeinmedizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)