• search hit 6 of 6
Back to Result List

Real-life characteristics and management of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease

  • This study aims to report real-life data on the characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD; except idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) across multiple specialised centres in Germany. Eligibility criteria included ILD affecting >10% of lung parenchyma on high-resolution computed tomography, a single breath diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≤80% predicted and active treatment of lung disease. Methods As of the interim analysis cut-off, 655 patients (mean±sd age 65.9±11.7 years, 54.5% male) were included. The most common ILD subtypes were fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis (31.2%), fibrosing ILD (22.0%), rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue disease ILDs (13.0%) and unclassifiable fibrosing ILD (13.0%). Results Lung function metrics included total lung capacity at 68.3±17.6% predicted, forced vital capacity at 69.8±19.8% predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 s at 73.7±19.5% predicted and DLCO at 33.8±15.6%This study aims to report real-life data on the characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD; except idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) across multiple specialised centres in Germany. Eligibility criteria included ILD affecting >10% of lung parenchyma on high-resolution computed tomography, a single breath diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≤80% predicted and active treatment of lung disease. Methods As of the interim analysis cut-off, 655 patients (mean±sd age 65.9±11.7 years, 54.5% male) were included. The most common ILD subtypes were fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis (31.2%), fibrosing ILD (22.0%), rheumatoid arthritis and connective tissue disease ILDs (13.0%) and unclassifiable fibrosing ILD (13.0%). Results Lung function metrics included total lung capacity at 68.3±17.6% predicted, forced vital capacity at 69.8±19.8% predicted, forced expiratory volume in 1 s at 73.7±19.5% predicted and DLCO at 33.8±15.6% predicted. Current treatments included oral steroids (62.6%), antifibrotic therapy (50.7%), azathioprine (14.4%), methotrexate (10.2%) and mycophenolate mofetil (11.1%). Patients on antifibrotic therapy were typically older at diagnosis and registry inclusion, more often male, had more comorbidities, a lower 6-min walk distance and reduced lung function metrics compared with those not on antifibrotic therapy. Notably, 27.3% of the patients on antifibrotic therapy did not meet progression criteria (INBUILD), whereas 40.1% of patients not receiving antifibrotic therapy did meet those criteria. Conclusion The patient characteristics observed align with those observed in randomised controlled trials and other noninterventional studies. Patients on antifibrotic therapy generally had more severe disease profiles.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Jürgen Behr, Michael Kreuter, Andreas U. Guenther, Francesco Bonella, David Pittrow, Christine Pausch, Benjamin Seeliger, Antje Prasse, Dirk Skowasch, Henrike Wilkens, Hans-Joachim Kabitz, Hubert Wirtz, Martin Claussen, Christian Grohé, Lars Hagmeyer, Stephan Budweiser, Ioana Andreica, Ulrich Neff, Heike Biller, Sven Glaeser, Martin Schwaiblmair, Peter Schramm, F. Joachim Meyer, Karine Thabaret, Jens Klotsche, Tobias Veit, Marion Frankenberger, Lea Drobbe, Wolfgang Gesierich, Bernd Seese, Elaine Koch, Achim Grünewaldt, Philipp Markart, Michael Westhoff, Matthias Held, Joachim Kirschner, Julia Wälscher, Stephan Eisenmann, Claus Neurohr, Claus-Peter Kreutz, Daniel Grund, Sabine Haberl, Ralf Ewert, Beate Stubbe, Markus Polke, Frank Reichenberger, Werner von Wulffen, Ekaterina Krauss, Michael Weber, Stephan Walterspacher, Dirk Koschel
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1231846
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/123184
ISSN:2312-0541OPAC
Parent Title (English):ERJ Open Research
Publisher:European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/07/25
Volume:11
Issue:3
First Page:00926-2024
Note:
Published on behalf of the INSIGHTS-ILD Registry Group. Please see publisher's website for further details.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00926-2024
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY-NC 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell (mit Print on Demand)