• search hit 8 of 12
Back to Result List

Patients' and dermatologists' preferences in artificial intelligence–driven skin cancer diagnostics: a prospective multicentric survey study

  • To the Editor: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise for improving diagnostics of skin cancer by matching or surpassing experienced clinicians.1 However, the successful clinical application depends on acceptance by patients and dermatologists. In this prospective multicentric survey study with a response rate of 63%, we therefore investigate the criteria required for patients and dermatologists to accept AI-systems and assess their importance on patients’ and dermatologists’ decision-making when considering the use of such systems. To this end, we perform an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis and analyze it using hierarchical Bayes estimation.2 By employing an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis, we investigate multiple influencing AI-features simultaneously (see Table I) whilst accounting for possible trade-offs (see Fig 1). For details on questionnaire development, participant recruitment, and statistical analysis, see Supplementary Methods, available viaTo the Editor: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise for improving diagnostics of skin cancer by matching or surpassing experienced clinicians.1 However, the successful clinical application depends on acceptance by patients and dermatologists. In this prospective multicentric survey study with a response rate of 63%, we therefore investigate the criteria required for patients and dermatologists to accept AI-systems and assess their importance on patients’ and dermatologists’ decision-making when considering the use of such systems. To this end, we perform an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis and analyze it using hierarchical Bayes estimation.2 By employing an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis, we investigate multiple influencing AI-features simultaneously (see Table I) whilst accounting for possible trade-offs (see Fig 1). For details on questionnaire development, participant recruitment, and statistical analysis, see Supplementary Methods, available via Mendeley at https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/2chcwnhpwj/1.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Sarah Haggenmüller, Roman C. Maron, Achim Hekler, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Jochen S. Utikal, Maria Gaiser, Verena Müller, Sascha Fabian, Friedegund Meier, Sarah Hobelsberger, Frank F. Gellrich, Mildred Sergon, Axel Hauschild, Michael Weichenthal, Lars E. French, Lucie Heinzerling, Justin G. Schlager, Kamran Ghoreschi, Max Schlaak, Franz J. Hilke, Sandra SchuhORCiDGND, Isabel Wolff
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1143855
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/114385
ISSN:0190-9622OPAC
Parent Title (English):Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/07/29
Volume:91
Issue:2
First Page:366
Last Page:370
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.04.033
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Dermatologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)