• search hit 3 of 397
Back to Result List

Climate solidarity, time, and ambivalence: on a new term and its historical legacy

  • The term “climate solidarity” has been one of the new key concepts of global environmental movements since the 2010s. UN Secretary-General Guterres made the term popular in March 2023 in his call for a Climate Solidarity Pact. In the political language of climate diplomacy, “climate solidarity” and “climate justice” are often used interchangeably; however, the idea behind the former refers more strongly to the social connectedness of the various actors and the political traditions found in social movements. The article extrapolates the ambivalences inherent in today’s notion of (global) climate solidarity, as they are based not only on the plurality of different notions of solidarity as a political evocation and a social practice but also on a contentious relationship between social-democratic thought and modern environmentalism. The article commences by retracing—reflecting on West German debates since the 1970s—the history of solidarity-based ideas, before teasing out lines ofThe term “climate solidarity” has been one of the new key concepts of global environmental movements since the 2010s. UN Secretary-General Guterres made the term popular in March 2023 in his call for a Climate Solidarity Pact. In the political language of climate diplomacy, “climate solidarity” and “climate justice” are often used interchangeably; however, the idea behind the former refers more strongly to the social connectedness of the various actors and the political traditions found in social movements. The article extrapolates the ambivalences inherent in today’s notion of (global) climate solidarity, as they are based not only on the plurality of different notions of solidarity as a political evocation and a social practice but also on a contentious relationship between social-democratic thought and modern environmentalism. The article commences by retracing—reflecting on West German debates since the 1970s—the history of solidarity-based ideas, before teasing out lines of conflict between the newly emerging environmental movement and Germany’s established Social Democrats. Expanding the perspective to include German intellectuals’ engagement with what were then called “Third World countries,” the article also includes debates about “alternative economies” and the future of Fordist forms of production, as they have also been discussed within the political left since the 1980s. Ultimately, this contribution argues, the debate on notions of progress and growth has decisively shaped current thought processes on climate solidarity and its embedded ambivalences.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Dietmar SüßORCiDGND
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/117746
ISBN:9781032627946OPAC
Parent Title (English):Ecological ambivalence, complexity, and change: perspectives from the environmental humanities
Publisher:Routledge
Place of publication:Abingdon
Editor:Simone M. MüllerORCiDGND, Matthias SchmidtORCiDGND, Kirsten TwelbeckORCiDGND
Type:Part of a Book
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2024/12/20
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/12/20
First Page:26
Last Page:42
DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032627984-4
Institutes:Philologisch-Historische Fakultät
Philologisch-Historische Fakultät / Geschichte
Philologisch-Historische Fakultät / Geschichte / Lehrstuhl für Neuere und Neueste Geschichte
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 30 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie / 300 Sozialwissenschaften