• search hit 3 of 27
Back to Result List

Applying a three-component approach to motivational regulation: relations of frequency, situation-specific fit and application quality of motivational regulation strategies with students' well-being

  • While motivational regulation has been shown to predict study motivation and success, its relations with student well-being have received little attention. The few studies available indicate an interplay between motivational and emotional processes within self-regulated learning and the importance of motivational regulation for outcomes beyond achievement. Prior research has mostly focused on frequency of strategy use, but recent findings advocate for conceptually broader approaches to self-regulation. We adopted a three-component approach to motivational regulation differentiating between frequency of strategy use, situation-specific fit, and application quality, and examined their relations with perceived regulatory effectiveness as a proximal and well-being as a distal correlate in two studies with university students (N1 = 234; N2 = 890, representatively stratified quota sample). All three components contributed additively and, in part, interactively to effectiveness andWhile motivational regulation has been shown to predict study motivation and success, its relations with student well-being have received little attention. The few studies available indicate an interplay between motivational and emotional processes within self-regulated learning and the importance of motivational regulation for outcomes beyond achievement. Prior research has mostly focused on frequency of strategy use, but recent findings advocate for conceptually broader approaches to self-regulation. We adopted a three-component approach to motivational regulation differentiating between frequency of strategy use, situation-specific fit, and application quality, and examined their relations with perceived regulatory effectiveness as a proximal and well-being as a distal correlate in two studies with university students (N1 = 234; N2 = 890, representatively stratified quota sample). All three components contributed additively and, in part, interactively to effectiveness and well-being. Effectiveness was also related to greater well-being. The findings have implications for motivational regulation theories and well-being interventions.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Sophie von der MülbeORCiDGND, Raven RinasORCiDGND, Markus DreselORCiDGND, Kristina StockingerORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1157106
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/115710
ISSN:1041-6080OPAC
Parent Title (English):Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/10/10
Volume:116
First Page:102561
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102561
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie / Lehrstuhl für Psychologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)