• search hit 36 of 481
Back to Result List

Developing the EPA guidance of pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia – results of a Delphi process

  • Background The development of guidelines is time-consuming and cost-intensive. The heterogeneity of clinical practice, evidence, and patients’ needs is an issue across Europe. An European core guidance for a specific psychiatric disorder may help to overcome this issue. Here, we present a progress report on the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) proof-of-concept approach to develop a European consensus guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. Methods All national psychiatric associations in Europe were contacted to provide their schizophrenia guidelines. Six guidelines were rated by three experts, experienced in the development of national and international guidelines, from three different countries (Italy, Hungary, and Germany), and the German schizophrenia guideline published in 2019 was found to have the highest quality. For this proof-of-concept approach, 45 recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia from the German guidelineBackground The development of guidelines is time-consuming and cost-intensive. The heterogeneity of clinical practice, evidence, and patients’ needs is an issue across Europe. An European core guidance for a specific psychiatric disorder may help to overcome this issue. Here, we present a progress report on the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) proof-of-concept approach to develop a European consensus guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia. Methods All national psychiatric associations in Europe were contacted to provide their schizophrenia guidelines. Six guidelines were rated by three experts, experienced in the development of national and international guidelines, from three different countries (Italy, Hungary, and Germany), and the German schizophrenia guideline published in 2019 was found to have the highest quality. For this proof-of-concept approach, 45 recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia from the German guideline were evaluated in a two-step Delphi process to determine their acceptability throughout the European continent. Results 44 experts participated in the first round and 40 experts in the second round of the Delphi process. Agreement among the involved experts was reached for 75% of the presented recommendations from the German schizophrenia guidelines. 11 out of 45 recommendations (24.4%) did not reach this level of agreement. Conclusions This progress report highlights the possibility of developing a pan-European core guidance on the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia by adapting national guidelines and reconciling their recommendations. However, several barriers in this adaptation process, such as non-agreement in recommendations with strong scientific evidence in the reconciling process, were identified and must be considered when developing the final guidance.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Peter Falkai, Elias WagnerGND, Miriam John, Vladislav Yakimov, Silvana Galderisi, Istvan Bitter, Geert Dom, Andrea Schmitt, Wolfgang Gaebel, Bernardo Carpiniello, Alkomiet HasanORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1190824
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/119082
ISSN:0924-9338OPAC
ISSN:1778-3585OPAC
Parent Title (English):European Psychiatry
Publisher:Royal College of Psychiatrists
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/02/14
Volume:68
Issue:1
First Page:e26
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1794
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Medizinische Fakultät / Bezirkskrankenhaus (BKH)
Medizinische Fakultät / Professur für Evidenzbasierte Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)