• search hit 42 of 458
Back to Result List

Feasibility and benefit of decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG) in advanced cancer patients with malignant bowel obstruction

  • Background and study aims Bowel obstruction is a common complication in advanced cancer patients. Patients are restricted in quality of life (QOL) due to nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain. Prospective data on the feasibility and benefit of decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG) are scarce. Patients and methods Patients suffering from symptomatic bowel obstruction due to advanced cancer were included prospectively in a single-center study when other treatments to eliminate the obstruction were impossible. Patients were given a questionnaire the day before dPEG (d-1) and, if the procedure was successful, the day after (d+1) and 14 days after the procedure (d14). Furthermore, lifetime after dPEG was assessed. Results 53 patients were included. dPEG was technically feasible in 34 of 53 (64.2%). Significant improvement could be shown for nausea and vomiting when comparing d-1 to d+1 (nausea (P = 0.002), vomiting (P < 0.001)) and when comparing d-1 to d14 (P =Background and study aims Bowel obstruction is a common complication in advanced cancer patients. Patients are restricted in quality of life (QOL) due to nausea, vomiting, or abdominal pain. Prospective data on the feasibility and benefit of decompressive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (dPEG) are scarce. Patients and methods Patients suffering from symptomatic bowel obstruction due to advanced cancer were included prospectively in a single-center study when other treatments to eliminate the obstruction were impossible. Patients were given a questionnaire the day before dPEG (d-1) and, if the procedure was successful, the day after (d+1) and 14 days after the procedure (d14). Furthermore, lifetime after dPEG was assessed. Results 53 patients were included. dPEG was technically feasible in 34 of 53 (64.2%). Significant improvement could be shown for nausea and vomiting when comparing d-1 to d+1 (nausea (P = 0.002), vomiting (P < 0.001)) and when comparing d-1 to d14 (P = 0.021 and P = 0.003, respectively). Comparing d+1 to d14, there was no further improvement. QOL improved significantly from 8.1 (mean) on d-1 to 5.9 (mean) on d+1 (P < 0.001). Median survival after successful dPEG was 27 days (range 2–353). Conclusions dPEG is an effective method for quickly relieve symptoms of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced cancer patients. However, the technical success rate is limited and needs to be improved. Prospective studies comparing endoscopic and computed tomography-guided procedures are needed to avoid unsuccessful procedures in patients with advanced cancer and limited life expectancy.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Julia Wanzl, Susanne Höfer, Tanja Schwamberger, Vidan Tadic, Anna MuzalyovaORCiDGND, Irmtraut Hainsch-Müller, Christoph Aulmann, Helmut MessmannORCiDGND, Andreas Probst
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1176799
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/117679
ISSN:2364-3722OPAC
ISSN:2196-9736OPAC
Parent Title (English):Endoscopy International Open
Publisher:Georg Thieme
Place of publication:Stuttgart
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/12/17
Volume:12
Issue:11
First Page:E1411
Last Page:E1416
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2458-9919
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Datenmanagement und Clinical Decision Support
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Palliativmedizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung (mit Print on Demand)