• search hit 12 of 60
Back to Result List

Ray visualization and through-focus optical quality of diffractive enhanced monofocal and extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses

  • Purpose: We compared two hybrid refractive-diffractive IOLs with enhanced depth of focus in an in vitro study with regard to optical quality in monochromatic and polychromatic light as well as their ray-propagation behavior. Methods: The Mono-EDoF ME4 IOL (Santen Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) and the Tecnis Symfony IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision, USA) were assessed using the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 (Trioptics GmbH, Germany) to measure the through focus (TF) modulation transfer function (MTF) using monochromatic green (546 nm) and polychromatic light at different spatial frequencies. Ray propagation imaging was performed using monochromatic green light (520 nm) projected through each IOL, while submerged in a bath of fluorescein solution. The visual pathways were captured by a camera mounted on a microscope. Ray visualization was additionally performed for a monofocal control IOL (W60-R IOL, Santen Pharmaceutical). Results: The Mono-EDoF IOL showed superior TF-MTF performance for defocusPurpose: We compared two hybrid refractive-diffractive IOLs with enhanced depth of focus in an in vitro study with regard to optical quality in monochromatic and polychromatic light as well as their ray-propagation behavior. Methods: The Mono-EDoF ME4 IOL (Santen Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) and the Tecnis Symfony IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision, USA) were assessed using the OptiSpheric IOL PRO 2 (Trioptics GmbH, Germany) to measure the through focus (TF) modulation transfer function (MTF) using monochromatic green (546 nm) and polychromatic light at different spatial frequencies. Ray propagation imaging was performed using monochromatic green light (520 nm) projected through each IOL, while submerged in a bath of fluorescein solution. The visual pathways were captured by a camera mounted on a microscope. Ray visualization was additionally performed for a monofocal control IOL (W60-R IOL, Santen Pharmaceutical). Results: The Mono-EDoF IOL showed superior TF-MTF performance for defocus of up to -1.3D compared to the Symfony IOL in monochromatic and polychromatic light. For higher defocus values, however, the Symfony showed superior performance than the Mono-EDoF. Image quality in polychromatic light decreased for both IOLs compared to monochromatic light. Ray propagation imaging revealed one distinct focus for the monofocal IOL. The Mono-EDoF demonstrated an elongated focus area. The Symfony showed two focal points. Conclusion: We found comparable deterioration of image quality in polychromatic light for both IOLs with improved intermediate range. The Mono-EDoF demonstrated an elongated focus and superior TF-MTF performance at lower defocus values, but it did not match the standard EDoF model at higher defocus.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Isabella Diana BaurORCiDGND, Ramin Khoramnia, Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd Auffarth, Grzegorz Łabuz
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1227617
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/122761
ISSN:1177-5483OPAC
Parent Title (English):Clinical Ophthalmology
Publisher:Dovepress
Place of publication:London
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/07/25
Volume:19
First Page:1673
Last Page:1682
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s520086
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Augenheilkunde
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):CC-BY-NC 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell (mit Print on Demand)