• search hit 15 of 273
Back to Result List

Retrospective analysis of long-term clinical and radiological outcome following surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis [Abstract]

  • Background: Spinal instrumentation for spondylodiscitis is still under debate. Surgical data is limited to relatively small case series with short term follow-up. In this study, we wanted to analyse biomechanical, surgical and neurological long-term outcomes in this patient group. Methods: We retrospectively screened the databases of two German primary care hospitals and identified 190 patients with non-specific SD between 2005 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were a) non-specific, non-tuberculous lumbar SD, b) minimum follow-up 1 year, c) Following surgical instrumentation. Clinical and radiological outcome was assessed before surgery, at discharge with a minimum of 12 months follow up. Results: Complete data was available in 70 patients (49 male, 21 female, age 67.0±12.1 years). The median follow-up was 6.6±4.2 years. 35 patients underwent posterior stabilization and decompression alone, 35 were operated in a two-stage ventro-dorsal interbody fusion with decompression. Pre- andBackground: Spinal instrumentation for spondylodiscitis is still under debate. Surgical data is limited to relatively small case series with short term follow-up. In this study, we wanted to analyse biomechanical, surgical and neurological long-term outcomes in this patient group. Methods: We retrospectively screened the databases of two German primary care hospitals and identified 190 patients with non-specific SD between 2005 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were a) non-specific, non-tuberculous lumbar SD, b) minimum follow-up 1 year, c) Following surgical instrumentation. Clinical and radiological outcome was assessed before surgery, at discharge with a minimum of 12 months follow up. Results: Complete data was available in 70 patients (49 male, 21 female, age 67.0±12.1 years). The median follow-up was 6.6±4.2 years. 35 patients underwent posterior stabilization and decompression alone, 35 were operated in a two-stage ventro-dorsal interbody fusion with decompression. Pre- and postoperative angles of the affected motion segment were 16±10.8 and 14±11.3° in patients with posterior instrumentation only, 19±9.6 and 16.9±9.7° in patients with combined anterior/posterior fusion. Vertebral body subsidence was seen in 12(34.3%) and 6(17.1%) cases following posterior instrumentation and ventro-dorsal instrumentation, respectively. Non-fusion was present in 22 (62.9%) and 11 (31.4%) cases following posterior instrumentation and 360° instrumentation, respectively. Overall length of hospital stay was 35±24.8 days. The complication rate of surgery was 18%(12/70). New neurological symptoms occurred in 7%(5/70). Revision surgery was performed in 3% (2/70) due to screw misplacement or hardware failure and in 4% (3/70) due to intraspinal hematoma. During follow-up, there were no SD-related deaths. Conclusion: A staged surgical approach, when appropriate, is safe and can lead to an excellent clinical and radiographic outcome in lumbar spondylodiscitis.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Björn Sommer, T. Babbe-Pekol, J. Feulner, R. H. Richter, M. Buchfelder, Ehab Shiban, S. Sesselmann, R. Forst, K. Wiendieck
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1228703
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/122870
ISSN:2772-5294OPAC
Parent Title (English):Brain and Spine
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2021
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/07/10
Volume:1
Issue:Supplement 2
First Page:100449
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2021.100449
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Neurochirurgie
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung (mit Print on Demand)