Differences in clinical reasoning between female and male medical students

  • Objectives In undergraduate medical education virtual patients (VPs) are a suitable method to teach clinical reasoning and support the visualization of this thinking process in a safe environment. The aim of our study was to investigate differences in the clinical reasoning process and diagnostic accuracy of female and male medical students. Methods During the summer term 2020, we provided access to 15 VPs for undergraduate students enrolled in a medical school in Bavaria, Germany. All interactions of the 179 learners within the VP system CASUS were recorded, exported, and analyzed. Results We found significant differences in the clinical reasoning of female and male learners. Female students documented more findings, differential diagnoses, tests, and treatment options and more often created a summary statement about the VP. Their overall performance was higher than those of their male peers, but we did not see any significant differences in diagnosticObjectives In undergraduate medical education virtual patients (VPs) are a suitable method to teach clinical reasoning and support the visualization of this thinking process in a safe environment. The aim of our study was to investigate differences in the clinical reasoning process and diagnostic accuracy of female and male medical students. Methods During the summer term 2020, we provided access to 15 VPs for undergraduate students enrolled in a medical school in Bavaria, Germany. All interactions of the 179 learners within the VP system CASUS were recorded, exported, and analyzed. Results We found significant differences in the clinical reasoning of female and male learners. Female students documented more findings, differential diagnoses, tests, and treatment options and more often created a summary statement about the VP. Their overall performance was higher than those of their male peers, but we did not see any significant differences in diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions The significant differences between male and female medical students should be considered when planning teaching and research activities. A future study should investigate whether these differences can also be found in physicians.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Inga HegeORCiDGND, Meike Hiedl, Karin Christine Huth, Jan Kiesewetter
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1005446
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/100544
ISSN:2194-8011OPAC
ISSN:2194-802XOPAC
Parent Title (English):Diagnosis
Publisher:Walter de Gruyter
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2023
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2022/12/21
Tag:Biochemistry (medical); Clinical Biochemistry; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Policy; Medicine (miscellaneous)
Volume:10
Issue:2
First Page:100
Last Page:104
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2022-0081
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Medical Education Sciences
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 37 Bildung und Erziehung / 370 Bildung und Erziehung
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)