Hope for ultimate goodness within theism and euteleology

  • Theists often argue that a theistic worldview is to be preferred over naturalist alternatives because hope for eschatological redemption and ultimate transformation of our lives towards the good is an integral part of theism. The argument is often presented in the form of an either-or juxtaposition: either theism and its eschatological hope for ultimate goodness, or naturalism with its bleak prospect that reality is at the very bottom only particles and the void. In this chapter, the author points out that this juxtaposition does not take into account a possible third alternative that has been discussed under the label non-personal or alternative concepts of the divine. The author explores the question to what extent the hope for ultimate goodness can be seen as justified within theism and also whether that hope can be reconstructed within the framework of an alternative concept of God, namely euteleology.

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Georg GasserORCiDGND
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/102392
ISBN:9781003111436OPAC
Parent Title (English):The divine nature: personal and a-personal perspectives
Publisher:Routledge
Place of publication:London
Editor:Simon Kittle, Georg GasserORCiDGND
Type:Part of a Book
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2022
Release Date:2023/03/03
First Page:62
Last Page:79
Series:Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion
DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003111436-5
Institutes:Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät
Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät / Systematische Theologie
Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät / Systematische Theologie / Professur für Philosophie