Timing of internal processes: investigating introspection about the costs of task switching and memory search

  • During the last two decades, there has been new interest in introspection about multitasking performance. In this field, subjective timing of one’s own reaction times (introspective RTs) has proven a useful measure to assess introspection. However, whether timing our own cognitive processing makes use of the same timing mechanisms as timing external intervals has been called into question. Here we take a novel approach to this question and build on the previously observed dissociation between the interference of task switching and memory search with a concurrent time production task whereby temporal productions increased with increasing memory set size but were not affected by switch costs. We tested whether a similar dissociation could be observed in this paradigm when participants provide introspective RTs instead of concurrent temporal productions. The results showed no such dissociation as switch costs and the effect of memory set size on RTs were both reflected in introspectiveDuring the last two decades, there has been new interest in introspection about multitasking performance. In this field, subjective timing of one’s own reaction times (introspective RTs) has proven a useful measure to assess introspection. However, whether timing our own cognitive processing makes use of the same timing mechanisms as timing external intervals has been called into question. Here we take a novel approach to this question and build on the previously observed dissociation between the interference of task switching and memory search with a concurrent time production task whereby temporal productions increased with increasing memory set size but were not affected by switch costs. We tested whether a similar dissociation could be observed in this paradigm when participants provide introspective RTs instead of concurrent temporal productions. The results showed no such dissociation as switch costs and the effect of memory set size on RTs were both reflected in introspective RTs. These findings indicate that the underlying timing mechanisms differ between temporal productions and introspective RTs in this multitasking context, and that introspective RTs are still strikingly accurate estimates of objective RTs.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Daniel Bratzke, Donna BryceORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1043097
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/104309
ISSN:1943-3921OPAC
ISSN:1943-393XOPAC
Parent Title (English):Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2022
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/05/11
Tag:Linguistics and Language; Sensory Systems; Language and Linguistics; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Volume:84
Issue:5
First Page:1501
Last Page:1508
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02510-6
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Psychologie / Lehrstuhl für Psychologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:1 Philosophie und Psychologie / 15 Psychologie / 150 Psychologie
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)