Analysis of volume and topography of adipose tissue in the trunk: results of MRI of 11,141 participants in the German National Cohort

  • This research addresses the assessment of adipose tissue (AT) and spatial distribution of visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous fat (SAT) in the trunk from standardized magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of deep learning (DL)–based image segmentation in a large population-based cohort in Germany (five sites). Volume and distribution of AT play an essential role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, a risk factor of developing metabolic/cardiovascular diseases. Cross-validated training of the DL-segmentation model led to a mean Dice similarity coefficient of >0.94, corresponding to a mean absolute volume deviation of about 22 ml. SAT is significantly increased in women compared to men, whereas VAT is increased in males. Spatial distribution shows age- and body mass index–related displacements. DL-based image segmentation provides robust and fast quantification of AT (≈15 s per dataset versus 3 to 4 hours for manual processing) and assessment of itsThis research addresses the assessment of adipose tissue (AT) and spatial distribution of visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous fat (SAT) in the trunk from standardized magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of deep learning (DL)–based image segmentation in a large population-based cohort in Germany (five sites). Volume and distribution of AT play an essential role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, a risk factor of developing metabolic/cardiovascular diseases. Cross-validated training of the DL-segmentation model led to a mean Dice similarity coefficient of >0.94, corresponding to a mean absolute volume deviation of about 22 ml. SAT is significantly increased in women compared to men, whereas VAT is increased in males. Spatial distribution shows age- and body mass index–related displacements. DL-based image segmentation provides robust and fast quantification of AT (≈15 s per dataset versus 3 to 4 hours for manual processing) and assessment of its spatial distribution from magnetic resonance images in large cohort studies.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Tobias Haueise, Fritz Schick, Norbert Stefan, Christopher L. Schlett, Jakob B. Weiss, Johanna Nattenmüller, Katharina Göbel-Guéniot, Tobias Norajitra, Tobias Nonnenmacher, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Klaus H. Maier-Hein, Thoralf Niendorf, Tobias Pischon, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Lale Umutlu, Annette Peters, Susanne Rospleszcz, Thomas KrönckeORCiDGND, Norbert Hosten, Henry Völzke, Lilian Krist, Stefan N. Willich, Fabian Bamberg, Juergen Machann
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1058681
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/105868
ISSN:2375-2548OPAC
Parent Title (English):Science Advances
Publisher:American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Place of publication:Washington, DC
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2023
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/07/11
Volume:9
Issue:19
First Page:eadd0433
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add0433
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)