Facilitating justification, disconfirmation, and transparency in diagnostic argumentation: effects of automatic adaptive feedback in teacher education

  • Teachers need to learn complex skills in higher education, such as diagnostic argumentation. We suggest that relations between the argumentation facets justification, disconfirmation, and transparency are a relevant indicator for the quality of diagnostic argumentation. In an experimental study, we investigated whether automatic adaptive feedback – based on natural language processing – compared to static feedback facilitates relations between the argumentation facets in preservice teachers' diagnostic argumentation when learning with case-based simulations. A sample of N = 60 preservice teachers received adaptive or static feedback on their written explanations concerning simulated cases of pupils having behavioral or reading and writing problems. Using Epistemic Network Analysis, we analyzed learners' written explana- tions and found that adaptive feedback compared to static feedback facilitates relations between justification, disconfirmation, and transparency in preservice teachers'Teachers need to learn complex skills in higher education, such as diagnostic argumentation. We suggest that relations between the argumentation facets justification, disconfirmation, and transparency are a relevant indicator for the quality of diagnostic argumentation. In an experimental study, we investigated whether automatic adaptive feedback – based on natural language processing – compared to static feedback facilitates relations between the argumentation facets in preservice teachers' diagnostic argumentation when learning with case-based simulations. A sample of N = 60 preservice teachers received adaptive or static feedback on their written explanations concerning simulated cases of pupils having behavioral or reading and writing problems. Using Epistemic Network Analysis, we analyzed learners' written explana- tions and found that adaptive feedback compared to static feedback facilitates relations between justification, disconfirmation, and transparency in preservice teachers' diagnostic argumentation. The results confirm that adaptivity is an important feature of effective feedback, which can be automated by methods of natural language processing.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Elisabeth BauerORCiDGND, Michael SailerORCiDGND, Jan Kiesewetter, Martin R. Fischer, Iryna Gurevych, Frank Fischer
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1090299
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/109029
ISSN:1010-0652OPAC
ISSN:1664-2910OPAC
Parent Title (German):Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie
Publisher:Hogrefe Publishing Group
Place of publication:Göttingen
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/11/10
Tag:Developmental and Educational Psychology
Volume:38
Issue:1-2
First Page:49
Last Page:54
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000363
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Empirische Bildungsforschung
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Empirische Bildungsforschung / Lehrstuhl für Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 37 Bildung und Erziehung / 370 Bildung und Erziehung
Licence (German):CC-BY-NC 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell (mit Print on Demand)