Increased migraine-free intervals with multifocal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • Introduction Episodic migraine is a debilitating condition associated with vast impairments of health, daily living, and life quality. Several prophylactic treatments exist, having a moderate ratio of action related to side effects and therapy costs. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence based therapy in several neuropsychiatric conditions, showing robust efficacy in alleviating specific symptoms. However, its efficacy in migraine disorders is unequivocal and might be tightly linked to the applied rTMS protocol. We hypothesized that multifocal rTMS paradigm could improve clinical outcomes in patients with episodic migraine by reducing the number of migraine days, frequency and intensity of migraine attacks, and improve the quality of life. Methods We conducted an experimental, double-blind, randomized controlled study by applying a multifocal rTMS paradigm. Patients with episodic migraine with or without aura were enrolled in two centers from AugustIntroduction Episodic migraine is a debilitating condition associated with vast impairments of health, daily living, and life quality. Several prophylactic treatments exist, having a moderate ratio of action related to side effects and therapy costs. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence based therapy in several neuropsychiatric conditions, showing robust efficacy in alleviating specific symptoms. However, its efficacy in migraine disorders is unequivocal and might be tightly linked to the applied rTMS protocol. We hypothesized that multifocal rTMS paradigm could improve clinical outcomes in patients with episodic migraine by reducing the number of migraine days, frequency and intensity of migraine attacks, and improve the quality of life. Methods We conducted an experimental, double-blind, randomized controlled study by applying a multifocal rTMS paradigm. Patients with episodic migraine with or without aura were enrolled in two centers from August 2018, to December 2019, and randomized to receive either real (n = 37) or sham (sham coil stimulation, n = 28) multifocal rTMS for six sessions over two weeks. Patients, physicians, and raters were blinded to the applied protocol. The experimental multifocal rTMS protocol included two components; first, swipe stimulation of 13 trains of 140 pulses/train, 67 Hz, 60% of RMT, and 2s intertrain interval and second, spot burst stimulation of 33 trains of 15 pulses/train, 67 Hz, 85% of RMT, and 8s intertrain interval. Reduction >50% from the baseline in migraine days (as primary outcome) and frequency and intensity of migraine attacks (as key secondary outcomes) over a 12-week period were assessed. To balance the baseline variables between the treatment arms, we applied the propensity score matching through the logistic regression. Results Among 65 randomized patients, sixty (age 39.7 ± 11.6; 52 females; real rTMS n = 33 and sham rTMS n = 27) completed the trial and five patients dropped out. Over 12 weeks, the responder's rate in the number of migraine days was significantly higher in the real rTMS compared to the sham group (42% vs. 26%, p < 0.05). The mean migraine days per month decreased from 7.6 to 4.3 days in the real rTMS group and from 6.2 to 4.3 days in the sham rTMS group, resulting in a difference with real vs. sham rTMS of −3.2 days (p < 0.05). Similarly, over the 12-week period, the responder's rate in the reduction of migraine attacks frequency was higher in the real rTMS compared to the sham group (42% vs 33%, p < 0.05). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion Our pilot study shows compelling evidence in a double placebo-controlled trial that multifocal rTMS is an effective and well-tolerated preventive treatment in patients with episodic migraine.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Pavel Leahu, Manuel Bange, Dumitru Ciolac, Stefanie Scheiter, Alexandru Matei, Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla, Venkata C. Chirumamilla, Stanislav A. Groppa, Muthuraman MuthuramanORCiDGND, Sergiu Groppa
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1097223
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/109722
ISSN:1935-861XOPAC
Parent Title (English):Brain Stimulation
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2021
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/12/05
Tag:Neurology (clinical); Biophysics; General Neuroscience
Volume:14
Issue:6
First Page:1544
Last Page:1552
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.383
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Informatik / Professur für Informatik in der Medizintechnik
Dewey Decimal Classification:0 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke / 00 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme / 004 Datenverarbeitung; Informatik
Licence (German):CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitung (mit Print on Demand)