Over and under-disclosure of standard essential patents: An EU approach to its effects on innovation and competition

  • This thesis explores whether competition law can and should address the effects of deviations from the duty of disclosing Standard Essential Patents (SEPs). The answer is a partial "yes" to both questions. Over and under-disclosure of SEPs occur for reasons beyond mere opportunism. The definition of essentiality is evolving. Technological changes and the complex nature of standardization often lead to mismatches in patent-holder knowledge and market knowledge. Disclosure practices vary widely based on the rules of Standard Development Organizations (SDOs). Deviations from disclosure of SEPs may merit competition law intervention. Anti-competitive effects can arise from under-disclosure, such as patent ambushes or exclusion of superior technologies, and over-disclosure, which can lead to royalty stacking. Competition law under Article 102 TFEU can intervene in some cases, though addressing over-disclosure is challenging. To improve SEP disclosure systems, the thesis proposes aThis thesis explores whether competition law can and should address the effects of deviations from the duty of disclosing Standard Essential Patents (SEPs). The answer is a partial "yes" to both questions. Over and under-disclosure of SEPs occur for reasons beyond mere opportunism. The definition of essentiality is evolving. Technological changes and the complex nature of standardization often lead to mismatches in patent-holder knowledge and market knowledge. Disclosure practices vary widely based on the rules of Standard Development Organizations (SDOs). Deviations from disclosure of SEPs may merit competition law intervention. Anti-competitive effects can arise from under-disclosure, such as patent ambushes or exclusion of superior technologies, and over-disclosure, which can lead to royalty stacking. Competition law under Article 102 TFEU can intervene in some cases, though addressing over-disclosure is challenging. To improve SEP disclosure systems, the thesis proposes a two-step approach: an early blanket disclosure to prevent ambushes, followed by a specific disclosure once the standard and patent are established. This approach would help ensure accuracy without imposing excessive burdens. While changes to disclosure rules should primarily be made by SDOs, the European Commission might intervene under Article 101 TFEU in certain cases prevent anti-competitive effects in technologies governed by network effects.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Vicente Zafrilla Díaz-MartaORCiD
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1203145
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/120314
Advisor:Josef Drexl
Type:Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2025/12/09
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Granting Institution:Universität Augsburg, Juristische Fakultät
Date of final exam:2023/11/15
Release Date:2025/12/09
GND-Keyword:Europäische Union; Patent; Standardisierung; Patentrecht; Transparenz
Page Number:289
Institutes:Juristische Fakultät
Juristische Fakultät / Institut für Zivilrecht
Juristische Fakultät / Institut für Zivilrecht / Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Wirtschaftsrecht, Gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und Arbeitsrecht
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 34 Recht / 340 Recht
Licence (German):Deutsches Urheberrecht