- This paper introduces Art_GenEvalGPT, a novel dataset of synthetic dialogues centered on art generated through ChatGPT. Unlike existing datasets focused on conventional art-related tasks, Art_GenEvalGPT delves into nuanced conversations about art, encompassing a wide variety of artworks, artists, and genres, and incorporating emotional interventions, integrating speakers’ subjective opinions and different roles for the conversational agents (e.g., teacher-student, expert guide, anthropic behavior or handling toxic users). Generation and evaluation stages of GenEvalGPT platform are used to create the dataset, which includes 13,870 synthetic dialogues, covering 799 distinct artworks, 378 different artists, and 26 art styles. Automatic and manual assessment proof the high quality of the synthetic dialogues generated. For the profile recovery, promising lexical and semantic metrics for objective and factual attributes are offered. For subjective attributes, the evaluation for detectingThis paper introduces Art_GenEvalGPT, a novel dataset of synthetic dialogues centered on art generated through ChatGPT. Unlike existing datasets focused on conventional art-related tasks, Art_GenEvalGPT delves into nuanced conversations about art, encompassing a wide variety of artworks, artists, and genres, and incorporating emotional interventions, integrating speakers’ subjective opinions and different roles for the conversational agents (e.g., teacher-student, expert guide, anthropic behavior or handling toxic users). Generation and evaluation stages of GenEvalGPT platform are used to create the dataset, which includes 13,870 synthetic dialogues, covering 799 distinct artworks, 378 different artists, and 26 art styles. Automatic and manual assessment proof the high quality of the synthetic dialogues generated. For the profile recovery, promising lexical and semantic metrics for objective and factual attributes are offered. For subjective attributes, the evaluation for detecting emotions or subjectivity in the interventions achieves 92% of accuracy using LLM-self assessment metrics.…
