Synchronous online learning supports cognitive and affective outcomes more than traditional face-to-face and asynchronous online education: a meta-analysis of webinars

  • The COVID-19 pandemic led schools and universities worldwide to rapidly shift from traditional, in-person classes to synchronous online learning through webinar platforms such as Zoom, WebEx, and Microsoft Teams. This meta-analysis examined 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3823 learners to better understand how effective synchronous online programs are for supporting both affective outcomes (such as attitudes, satisfaction, self-efficacy, and interest) and cognitive outcomes (including declarative knowledge and procedural skills). Overall, the findings show that synchronous online learning is more effective than asynchronous online and face-to-face education in improving both learners' affect and their learning performance. The strongest positive effects of webinars appeared when they were compared to waitlist groups and asynchronous courses, and when affective outcomes focused on learners' self-efficacy beliefs. The study also found a significant link between affectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic led schools and universities worldwide to rapidly shift from traditional, in-person classes to synchronous online learning through webinar platforms such as Zoom, WebEx, and Microsoft Teams. This meta-analysis examined 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3823 learners to better understand how effective synchronous online programs are for supporting both affective outcomes (such as attitudes, satisfaction, self-efficacy, and interest) and cognitive outcomes (including declarative knowledge and procedural skills). Overall, the findings show that synchronous online learning is more effective than asynchronous online and face-to-face education in improving both learners' affect and their learning performance. The strongest positive effects of webinars appeared when they were compared to waitlist groups and asynchronous courses, and when affective outcomes focused on learners' self-efficacy beliefs. The study also found a significant link between affective and cognitive outcomes. Finally, we highlight practical implications for instructional design and suggest directions for future research on webinar-based learning.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Andreas GegenfurtnerORCiDGND, Aldin AlijagicORCiDGND, Sylvia GabelGND, Özün KeskinORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1274856
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/127485
ISSN:1041-6080OPAC
Parent Title (English):Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2026
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2026/01/19
Volume:126
First Page:102862
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102862
Institutes:Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Methoden der empirischen Unterrichtsforschung
Philosophisch-Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät / Methoden der empirischen Unterrichtsforschung / Professur für Methoden der empirischen Unterrichtsforschung
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 37 Bildung und Erziehung / 370 Bildung und Erziehung
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung