Objectives
Medical imaging plays an essential role in healthcare. As a diagnostic test, imaging is prone to substantial overuse and potential overdiagnosis, with dire consequences to patient outcomes and health care costs. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) were developed to guide referring physicians in making appropriate imaging decisions. This study will evaluate the effect of implementing a CDSS (ESR iGuide) with versus without active decision support in a physician order entry on the appropriate use of imaging tests and ordering behaviour.
Methods
A protocol for a multi-center cluster-randomized trial with departments acting as clusters, combined with a before-after-revert design. Four university hospitals with eight participating departments each for a total of thirty-two clusters will be included in the study.
All departments start in control condition with structured data entry of the clinical indication and tracking of the imaging exams requested. Initially, the CDSS is implemented and all physicians remain blinded to appropriateness scores based on the ESR imaging referral guidelines. After randomization, half of the clusters switch to the active intervention of decision support. Physicians in the active condition are made aware of the categorization of their requests as appropriate, under certain conditions appropriate, or inappropriate, and appropriate exams are suggested. Physicians may change their requests in response to feedback. In the revert condition, active decision support is removed to study the educational effect.
Results/conclusions
The main outcome is the proportion of inappropriate diagnostic imaging exams requested per cluster. Secondary outcomes are the absolute number of imaging exams, radiation from diagnostic imaging, and medical costs.
Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have been developed to give guidance for referring physicians to make appropriate decisions at the point of care. The MIDAS study, a multicenter cluster randomized trial at four German university hospitals, was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a CDSS for imaging referral (ESR iGuide) in routine clinical care. Based on our experience within the MIDAS study, we aim to describe the hurdles and difficulties, as well as the various insights gained, in the process of implementing a CDSS in a clinical and research setting. To successfully implement a CDSS for imaging requests, it is essential to monitor and address technical issues, adapt local workflows, define the scope and content, and prioritize user experience and acceptance.
