Open Access

Background: While substantial progress has been made in the development of disease-modifying medications for multiple sclerosis (MS), a high percentage of treated patients still show progression and persistent inflammatory activity. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) aims at eliminating a pathogenic immune repertoire through intense short-term immunosuppression that enables subsequent regeneration of a new and healthy immune system to re-establish immune tolerance for a long period of time. A number of mostly open-label, uncontrolled studies conducted over the past 20 years collected about 4000 cases. They uniformly reported high efficacy of AHSCT in controlling MS inflammatory disease activity, more markedly beneficial in relapsing-remitting MS. Immunological studies provided evidence for qualitative immune resetting following AHSCT. These data and improved safety profiles of transplantation procedures spurred interest in using AHSCT as a treatment option for MS. Objective: To develop expert consensus recommendations on AHSCT in Germany and outline a registry study project. Methods: An open call among MS neurologists as well as among experts in stem cell transplantation in Germany started in December 2021 to join a series of virtual meetings. Results: We provide a consensus-based opinion paper authored by 25 experts on the up-to-date optimal use of AHSCT in managing MS based on the Swiss criteria. Current data indicate that patients who are most likely to benefit from AHSCT have relapsing-remitting MS and are young, ambulatory and have high disease activity. Treatment data with AHSCT will be collected within the German REgistry Cohort of autologous haematopoietic stem CeLl trAnsplantation In MS (RECLAIM). Conclusion: Further clinical trials, including registry-based analyses, are urgently needed to better define the patient characteristics, efficacy and safety profile of AHSCT compared with other high-efficacy therapies and to optimally position it as a treatment option in different MS disease stages. Keywords: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), multiple sclerosis, registry study, treatment recommendation.

Objective: This study analyzed clinical characteristics, attack recovery and long-term disability accumulation in late-onset (LO ≥ 50 years at onset) versus early-onset (EO < 50 years) NMOSD. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included demographic and clinical data from 446 NMOSD patients collected from 35 German Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) centers. Time to disability milestones was estimated through Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for sex, year of onset, immunotherapy exposure and antibody status. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to compare attack outcomes. Results: Of the 446 NMOSD patients analyzed (83.4% female, 85.4% AQP4-IgG-positive, median age at disease onset = 43 years), 153 had a late-onset (34.3%). AQP4-IgG+ prevalence was higher in LO- than in EO-NMOSD (94.1% vs. 80.9%, p<0.001). Optic neuritis at onset was more frequent in EO-NMOSD (27.4% vs. 42.6%, p<0.002), whereas myelitis was more common in LO-NMOSD (58.4% vs. 37.9%, p<0.001). Both groups had similar annualized attack rates (AAR, 0.51 vs. 0.54, p=0.352), but attack recovery was poorer (complete remission in 15.6% vs. 27.4%, p<0.001) and relapse-associated worsening (RAW) was higher in LO-NMOSD (RAW: 3 vs. 0.5, p<0.001). Long-term immunotherapy use was comparable. LO-NMOSD exhibited faster progression to disability endpoints (EDSS 4: HR = 2.64, 95% CI=1.81–3.84). Interpretation: LO-NMOSD patients presented more often with myelitis, experienced worse attack outcomes and faster disability accumulation, despite comparable AAR, acute attack treatment and long-term treatment regimens. Accordingly, therapeutic strategies for attack and prophylactic treatment in LO-NMOSD have to be improved.