Open Access

What is known and Objective Hepatic impairment (HI) is a known risk factor for drug safety. The MELD score (Model-for-endstage-liver-disease), calculated from serum creatinine, bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio (INR), is a promising screening tool corresponding to Child-Pugh Score (CPS) for drug adjustment. We tested the feasibility of MELD as an automatic screening tool accounting for correct calculation, interfering factors (IF) and detection of patients corresponding to CPS-B/C potentially requiring drug adjustment. Methods We retrospectively calculated MELD for a 3-month cohort of surgical patients and assessed need for adjustment of MELD parameters to standard values. IF for INR (oral anticoagulants) and serum creatinine (renal insufficiency (RI; eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m²); as well as drugs elevating creatinine levels (DECL)) and the number of patients with MELD scores corresponding to CPS-B/C were analysed. For MELD ≥7.5, liver and bile diagnoses were recorded. Results and discussion Of 1183 patients, MELD was calculable for 761 (64%; median 7.5, range 6.4–36.8). Parameters had to be adjusted for 690 (91%) patients. IF of parameters were RI in 172 (23%), INR-elevating drugs in 105 (14%) and DECL in 33 (4%) patients. Of 335 (44%) patients with MELD ≥7.5, 122 (36%) had documented liver or bile diagnoses. MELD 10-<15 (corresponding to CPS-B) was found for 105 (14%), MELD ≥15 (corresponding to CPS-C) for 66 (9%) of the 761 patients with a calculated MELD. Referred to all patients, drug adjustments due to possible HI were recommendable for 14% of patients with suspected CPS-B/C. What is new and Conclusion MELD is a feasible screening tool for HI as a risk factor for drug safety at hospital admission when appropriately considering correct parameter adjustment and RI and INR-elevating drugs as IF. Further evaluation of sensitivity and specificity is needed.

What is known and objective Renal impairment (RI) and renal drug-related problems (rDRP) often remain unrecognized in the community setting. A “renal pharmacist consultant service” (RPCS) at hospital admission can support patient safety by detecting rDRP. However, the efficient information sharing from pharmacists to physicians is still discussed. The aim of the study was to test the implementation of a RPCS and its effectiveness on prescription changes and to evaluate two ways of written information sharing with physicians. Methods Urological patients with eGFRnon-indexed of 15-59 ml/min and ≥1 drug were reviewed for manifest and potential rDRP at admission by a pharmacist. Written recommendations for dose or drug adaptation were forwarded to physicians comparing two routes: July-September 2017 paper form in handwritten chart; November 2017-January 2018 digital PDF document in the electronic patient information system and e-mail alert. Prescription changes regarding manifest rDRP were evaluated and compared with a previous retrospective study without RPCS. Results and discussion The RPCS detected rDRP in 63 of 234 (26.9%) patients and prepared written recommendations (median 1 rDRP (1-5) per patient) concerning 110 of 538 (20.5%) drugs at admission. For manifest rDRP, acceptance rates of recommendations were 62.5% (paper) vs 42.9% (digital) (P = 0.16). Compared with the retrospective study without RPCS (prescription changes in 21/76 rDRP; 27.6%), correct prescribing concerning manifest rDRP significantly increased by 27.1%. What is new and conclusion A RPCS identifies patients at risk for rDRP and significantly increases appropriate prescribing by physicians. In our hospital (no electronic order entry, electronic chart or ward pharmacists), consultations in paper form seem to be superior to a digital PDF document.

Background Hepatic insufficiency can affect patient safety and should therefore be considered during drug therapy. Hospital admission offers an ideal point to screen for patients at risk and to adjust drug therapy accordingly. Objective To assess the number of patients admitted to hospital with clinically elevated liver parameters. To identify high-risk patients in need of potential drug therapy adjustment to liver function by calculation of liver scores. Finally, to investigate whether pre-hospital medication needed adjustment to liver function. Setting Patients admitted to surgical wards of a tertiary teaching hospital. Method Surgical patients were included in a 3-month retrospective study. A pharmacist-led screening process, including recording of elevated liver parameters and calculation of liver scores (Child–Pugh-score, Model of End-stage Liver Disase [MELD], MELDNa), was used to assess frequency of hepatic insufficiency and patients potentially needing medication adjustment. Additionally, pre-hospital medication was checked for contraindications and correct dosage with regard to liver function. Main outcome measure Percentage of surgical patients with clinically elevated liver parameters at admission, percentage of patients with hepatic insufficiency potentially needing drug therapy adjustment, and percentage of pre-hospital drug intakes not adjusted to liver function. Results Of 1200 patients, 130 (11%) had at least one clinically relevant elevated liver parameter at hospital admission. Of these, need for drug adjustment to liver function was found for 16–36%, depending on the liver score used (equivalent to 2–4% of all patients), with the highest number of patients detected by the MELD- and MELDNa-score. Pre-hospital medication concerned 719 drug intakes and was contraindicated in 2%, dosage not adjusted in 3%, and evaluation not possible in 44% of all drug intakes due to lack of information on the drug. Conclusion A significant proportion of patients admitted for surgery have clinically elevated liver parameters and potentially need medication adjustment. A pharmacist-led screening already at hospital admission can support the identification of patients with clinically relevant elevated liver parameters and patients at risk by calculating liver scores under routine conditions. Evaluation of drug adjustment to liver function is challenging, since no data are available in routine resources for a considerable number of drugs.

Background QTc interval prolongation can result in potentially lethal arrhythmias. One risk factor is QTc-prolonging drugs, including some antifungals often used in hemato-oncology patients. Screening tools for patients at risk have not yet been investigated in this patient population. Aim Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of five QTc risk scores in hemato-oncology patients receiving systemic antifungal therapy. Method Data were retrieved from an internal study database including adult hemato-oncology patients prescribed systemic antifungal therapy. Data on QTc-prolonging medication, risk factors for QTc prolongation, and electrocardiograms (ECG) were collected retrospectively for a period of 12 months. The QTc risk scores according to Tisdale, Vandael, Berger, Bindraban, and Aboujaoude as well as their sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results During the evaluated period, 77 patients were prescribed systemic antifungals resulting in 187 therapy episodes. Regarding therapy episodes, median age was 56 years (IQR 44–68), 41% (77) were female, and a median of 3 QTc-prolonging drugs were prescribed (range 0–6). ECGs were available for 45 (24%) of the therapy episodes 3–11 days after initiation of the antifungal therapy, 22 of which showed QTc prolongation. Regarding these 45 therapy episodes, sensitivity and specificity of the risk scores were calculated as follows: Tisdale 86%/22%, Vandael 91%/35%, Berger 32%/83%, Bindraban 50%/78%, Aboujaoude 14%/87%. Conclusion The QTc risk scores according to Tisdale and Vandael showed sufficient sensitivity for risk stratification in the studied patient population. In contrast, risk scores according to Berger, Bindraban, and Aboujaoude cannot be considered suitable due to poor sensitivity.