Open Access

The International Society of AD (ISAD) organized a roundtable on global aspects of AD at the WCD 2023 in Singapore. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) consortium, at least 171 million individuals were affected with AD in 2019, corresponding to 2.23% of the world population, with age-standardized prevalence and incidence rates that were relatively stable from 1990 to 2019. Based on the panel experience, most AD cases are mild-to-moderate. Without parallel data on disease prevalence and severity, the GBD data are difficult to interpret in many regions. This gap is particularly important in countries with limited medical infrastructure, but indirect evidence suggests a significant burden of AD in low-and-medium resource settings, especially urban areas. The Singapore roundtable was an opportunity to compare experiences in World Bank category 1 (Madagascar and Mali), 3 (Brazil, China) and 4 (Australia, Germany, Qatar, USA, Singapore, Japan) countries. The panel concluded that current AD guidelines are not adapted for low resource settings and a more pragmatic approach, as developed by WHO for skin NTDs, would be advisable for minimal access to moisturizers and topical corticosteroids. The panel also recommended prioritizing prevention studies, regardless of the level of existing resources. For disease long-term control in World Bank category 3 and most category 4 countries, the main problem is not access to drugs for most mild-to-moderate cases, but rather poor compliance due to insufficient time at visits. Collaboration with WHO, patient advocacy groups and industry may promote global change, improve capacity training and fight current inequalities. Finally, optimizing management of AD and its comorbidities needs more action at the primary care level, because reaching specialist care is merely aspirational in most settings. Primary care empowerment with store and forward telemedicine and algorithms based on augmented intelligence is a future goal.

NOD/Scid IL2Rγnull (NSG) mice reconstituted with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) donated by patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease highly reflect the respective pathological phenotype. To determine if these findings could be applicable to atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis vulgaris (PV), PBMCs isolated from AD and PV patients were first subjected to immunological profiling. Subsequently, NSG mice were reconstituted with these PBMCs. Hierarchical clustering and network analysis revealed a distinct profile of AD and PV patients with activated CD4+ T cells (CD69, CD25) occupying a central position in the AD network and CD4+ CD134+ cells acting as the main hub in the PV network. Following dermal application of DMSO, both NSG-AD and NSG-PV mice exhibited increased clinical, skin and histological scores. Immuno-histochemical analysis, frequencies of splenic human leukocytes, and cytokine expression levels indicated that CD4+ CD69+ cells, M1 and TSLPR-expressing monocytes, switched B cells and MCP-3 were the driving factors of inflammation in NSG-AD mice. In contrast, inflammation in NSG-PV mice was characterized by an increase in fibroblasts in the epidermis, frequencies of CD1a-expressing monocytes and IL-17 levels. Therefore, the pathological phenotypes of NSG-AD and NSG-PV mice differ and partially reflect the respective human disease.

The objective was to study a large, international, ethnically diverse population of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) to support the creation of patient-centric recommendations for AD management. Qualitative data were generated from 45-min, 1:1 telephone interviews conducted across 15 countries in each patient’s native language. Interviews explored the impact of AD on patients’ lives, patients’ most important symptoms, treatment expectations, and treatment decision-making. Participants were also questioned on their current knowledge of AD scoring systems and what was most important to include in these tools. In total, 88 adult patients (≥ 18 years old) receiving treatment for AD were recruited through a market research database, clinician referrals, and local advertising. All patients were screened to ensure a balanced and diverse sample in terms of age, gender, educational level, employment status, geographic location, and AD severity. Patients involved in market research or activities supporting advocacy groups within the previous 6 months or affiliated with or employed by pharmaceutical companies were excluded. AD had a substantial impact on patients’ lives. Itch, skin redness, and dry/flaky skin were the most frequently reported symptoms, with > 75% of patients experiencing these symptoms every 1–3 days. Mental health issues were common and resulted in the greatest negative impact on patients’ daily lives. Patients perceived clinicians to underestimate the burden of their AD. Patients had little awareness of AD scoring systems and indicated a preference for these to be more clearly incorporated in clinical practice. For an ideal scoring system, patients favored using a combination of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes to reflect disease burden and ensure consistency across all settings. This global study generated diverse patient perspectives on the disease burden of AD, their expectations of treatment, and their views on AD scoring methods. These data provide evidence to support the development of patient-centric recommendations for AD management.