Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Document Type
- Article (4)
Language
- English (4)
Keywords
- Hematology (1)
- Immunology and Allergy (1)
Background
Local ablative therapies (LAT) are increasingly used in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), yet evidence-based standards are lacking. This study aimed to assess the impact of LAT on survival of metastatic STS patients and to identify prognostic factors.
Methods
In this retrospective multicenter study, 246 STS patients with metastatic disease who underwent LAT on tumor board recommendation between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. A mixed effects model was applied to evaluate multiple survival events per patient.
Results
Median overall survival (OS) after first metastasis was 5.4 years with 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates of 93.7, 81.7, and 53.1%, respectively. A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of liver metastases were positively correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) after LAT (HR=0.61, p=0.00032 and HR=0.52, p=0.0081, respectively). A treatment-free interval ≥12 months and treatment of metastatic lesions in a single organ site other than lung and liver were positive prognostic factors for OS after first LAT (HR=0.50, p=0.028 and HR=0.40, p=0.026, respectively) while rare histotypes and LAT other than surgery and radiotherapy were negatively associated with OS after first LAT (HR=2.56, p=0.020 and HR=3.87, p=0.025). Additional systemic therapy was independently associated with a PFS benefit in patients ≤60 years with ≥4 metastatic lesions (for max. diameter of treated lesions ≤2cm: HR=0.32, p=0.02 and >2cm: HR=0.20, p=0.0011, respectively).
Conclusion
This multicenter study conducted at six German university hospitals underlines the value of LAT in metastatic STS. The exceptionally high survival rates are likely to be associated with patient selection and treatment in specialized sarcoma centers.
Background: Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is the most frequently performed local ablative therapy for leiomyosarcoma (LMS), synovial sarcoma (SyS), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). This study aimed to assess surgical feasibility, outcome, and clinical prognostic factors, as well as the value of a peri-interventional systemic therapy.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 77 patients with LMS, SyS, or UPS who underwent first-time complete resection of isolated lung metastases between 2009 and 2021. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical prognostic factors were analyzed.
Results: After the first PM, the median DFS was 7.4 months, and the median OS was 58.7 months. A maximal lesion diameter greater than 2 cm was associated with reduced DFS in both the univariable (hazard ratio [HR], 2.29; p = 0.006) and multivariable (HR, 2.60; p = 0.005) analyses. The univariable analysis identified a maximal lesion diameter greater than 2 cm as an adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR, 5.6; p < 0.001), whereas a treatment-free interval longer than 12 months was associated with improved OS (HR, 0.42; p = 0.032). The addition of systemic therapy was associated with a trend toward improved DFS for patients with lesions larger than 2 cm (HR, 0.29; p = 0.063). Severe postoperative complications (grade ≥IIIa) occurred in 2 % of the patients.
Conclusion: The size of resected lung metastases might be a more relevant prognostic factor than their number for patients with LMS, SyS, or UPS. For patients with lung metastases larger than 2 cm in maximal diameter, additional systemic therapy may be warranted.
