• search hit 10 of 10
Back to Result List

A tumor volume segmentation algorithm based on radiomics features in FDG-PET in lung cancer patients, validated using surgical specimens

  • Background: Although the integration of positron emission tomography into radiation therapy treatment planning has become part of clinical routine, the best method for tumor delineation is still a matter of debate. In this study, therefore, we analyzed a novel, radiomics-feature-based algorithm in combination with histopathological workup for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: A total of 20 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer who underwent [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) examination before tumor resection were included. Tumors were segmented in positron emission tomography (PET) data using previously reported algorithms based on three different radiomics features, as well as a threshold-based algorithm. To obtain gold-standard results, lesions were measured after resection. Pathological volumes and maximal diameters were then compared with the results of the segmentation algorithms. Results: A total of 20 lesions wereBackground: Although the integration of positron emission tomography into radiation therapy treatment planning has become part of clinical routine, the best method for tumor delineation is still a matter of debate. In this study, therefore, we analyzed a novel, radiomics-feature-based algorithm in combination with histopathological workup for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: A total of 20 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer who underwent [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) examination before tumor resection were included. Tumors were segmented in positron emission tomography (PET) data using previously reported algorithms based on three different radiomics features, as well as a threshold-based algorithm. To obtain gold-standard results, lesions were measured after resection. Pathological volumes and maximal diameters were then compared with the results of the segmentation algorithms. Results: A total of 20 lesions were analyzed. For all algorithms, segmented volumes correlated well with pathological volumes. In general, the threshold-based volumes exhibited a tendency to be smaller than the radiomics-based volumes. For all lesions, conventional threshold-based segmentation produced coefficients of variation which corresponded best with pathologically based volumes; however, for lesions larger than 3 ccm, the algorithm based on Local Entropy performed best, with a significantly better coefficient of variation (p = 0.0002) than the threshold-based algorithm. Conclusions: We found that, for small lesions, results obtained using conventional threshold-based segmentation compared well with pathological volumes. For lesions larger than 3 ccm, the novel algorithm based on Local Entropy performed best. These findings confirm the results of our previous phantom studies. This algorithm is therefore worthy of inclusion in future studies for further confirmation and application.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Lena Bundschuh, Jens Buermann, Marieta Toma, Joachim Schmidt, Glen KristiansenORCiD, Markus Essler, Ralph Alexander BundschuhORCiDGND, Vesna Prokic
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1212782
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/121278
ISSN:2075-4418OPAC
Parent Title (English):Diagnostics
Publisher:MDPI AG
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/04/10
Volume:14
Issue:23
First Page:2654
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14232654
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Nuklearmedizin
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)