• search hit 3 of 4
Back to Result List

Disentangling effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services - a multi‐scale experimental design

  • Climate and land-use change are key drivers of environmental degradation in the Anthropocene, but too little is known about their interactive effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Long-term data on biodiversity trends are currently lacking. Furthermore, previous ecological studies have rarely considered climate and land use in a joint design, did not achieve variable independence or lost statistical power by not covering the full range of environmental gradients. Here, we introduce a multi-scale space-for-time study design to disentangle effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services. The site selection approach coupled extensive GIS-based exploration (i.e. using a Geographic information system) and correlation heatmaps with a crossed and nested design covering regional, landscape and local scales. Its implementation in Bavaria (Germany) resulted in a set of study plots that maximise the potential range and independence of environmental variables atClimate and land-use change are key drivers of environmental degradation in the Anthropocene, but too little is known about their interactive effects on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Long-term data on biodiversity trends are currently lacking. Furthermore, previous ecological studies have rarely considered climate and land use in a joint design, did not achieve variable independence or lost statistical power by not covering the full range of environmental gradients. Here, we introduce a multi-scale space-for-time study design to disentangle effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services. The site selection approach coupled extensive GIS-based exploration (i.e. using a Geographic information system) and correlation heatmaps with a crossed and nested design covering regional, landscape and local scales. Its implementation in Bavaria (Germany) resulted in a set of study plots that maximise the potential range and independence of environmental variables at different spatial scales. Stratifying the state of Bavaria into five climate zones (reference period 1981–2010) and three prevailing land-use types, that is, near-natural, agriculture and urban, resulted in 60 study regions (5.8 × 5.8 km quadrants) covering a mean annual temperature gradient of 5.6–9.8°C and a spatial extent of ~310 × 310 km. Within these regions, we nested 180 study plots located in contrasting local land-use types, that is, forests, grasslands, arable land or settlement (local climate gradient 4.5–10°C). This approach achieved low correlations between climate and land use (proportional cover) at the regional and landscape scale with |r ≤ 0.33| and |r ≤ 0.29| respectively. Furthermore, using correlation heatmaps for local plot selection reduced potentially confounding relationships between landscape composition and configuration for plots located in forests, arable land and settlements. The suggested design expands upon previous research in covering a significant range of environmental gradients and including a diversity of dominant land-use types at different scales within different climatic contexts. It allows independent assessment of the relative contribution of multi-scale climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Understanding potential interdependencies among global change drivers is essential to develop effective restoration and mitigation strategies against biodiversity decline, especially in expectation of future climatic changes. Importantly, this study also provides a baseline for long-term ecological monitoring programs.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Sarah Redlich, Jie Zhang, Caryl Benjamin, Maninder Singh Dhillon, Jana Englmeier, Jörg Ewald, Ute Fricke, Cristina Ganuza, Maria Haensel, Thomas Hovestadt, Johannes Kollmann, Thomas Koellner, Carina Kübert‐Flock, Harald KunstmannORCiDGND, Annette Menzel, Christoph Moning, Wibke Peters, Rebekka Riebl, Thomas RummlerORCiDGND, Sandra Rojas‐Botero, Cynthia Tobisch, Johannes Uhler, Lars Uphus, Jörg Müller, Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-910702
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/91070
ISSN:2041-210XOPAC
Parent Title (English):Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher:Wiley
Place of publication:Oxford
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2022
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2021/12/09
Tag:Ecological Modelling; Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Volume:13
Issue:2
First Page:514
Last Page:527
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13759
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie / Lehrstuhl für Regionales Klima und Hydrologie
Nachhaltigkeitsziele
Nachhaltigkeitsziele / Ziel 2 - Kein Hunger
Nachhaltigkeitsziele / Ziel 11 - Nachhaltige Städte und Gemeinden
Nachhaltigkeitsziele / Ziel 13 - Maßnahmen zum Klimaschutz
Nachhaltigkeitsziele / Ziel 15 - Leben an Land
Dewey Decimal Classification:9 Geschichte und Geografie / 91 Geografie, Reisen / 910 Geografie, Reisen
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)