• search hit 2 of 4066
Back to Result List

Wheat yield forecasts with seasonal climate models and long short-term memory networks

  • The potential of seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) within machine learning models to forecast crop yields remains unexplored. We propose a workflow for integrating SCF data into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to forecast wheat yield at the county level across the Great Plains in the United States. Each month, past predictors were filled with observations and future weather predictors were forecasted using the seasonal climate model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (SCF approach). This approach was benchmarked with the truncate approach that only used observed predictors. Using all observed predictors at harvest, the model achieved an R2 of 0.46, an NRMSE of 0.24, and an MSE of 0.46 t/ha on the test set. The SCF approach and truncate approach performed poorly from January to March. The SCF approach outperformed the truncate approach in April and May. At the beginning of May, three months before harvest, the SCF approach achieved an MSE of 0.6 t/ha,The potential of seasonal climate forecasts (SCFs) within machine learning models to forecast crop yields remains unexplored. We propose a workflow for integrating SCF data into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to forecast wheat yield at the county level across the Great Plains in the United States. Each month, past predictors were filled with observations and future weather predictors were forecasted using the seasonal climate model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (SCF approach). This approach was benchmarked with the truncate approach that only used observed predictors. Using all observed predictors at harvest, the model achieved an R2 of 0.46, an NRMSE of 0.24, and an MSE of 0.46 t/ha on the test set. The SCF approach and truncate approach performed poorly from January to March. The SCF approach outperformed the truncate approach in April and May. At the beginning of May, three months before harvest, the SCF approach achieved an MSE of 0.6 t/ha, improving the truncate approach by 10 %. In June, the SCF approach further improved but did not outperform the truncate approach. Predictor importance analysis revealed the critical role of SCF data at the beginning of May for the latter half of May. This study suggests that weather forecasts issued at the right time, when both crop development and forecast skill align, could be as short as 16 days and still significantly improve the accuracy of sub-national wheat yield forecasts over other approaches.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Maximilian Zachow, Stella Ofori-Ampofo, Harald KunstmannORCiDGND, Rıdvan S. Kuzu, Xiao X. Zhu, Senthold Asseng
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1253122
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/125312
Parent Title (English):Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher:Elsevier
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2025/09/16
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/09/20
Volume:239
Issue:part B
First Page:110965
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110965
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie / Lehrstuhl für Regionales Klima und Hydrologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:9 Geschichte und Geografie / 91 Geografie, Reisen / 910 Geografie, Reisen
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)