• search hit 1 of 60
Back to Result List

What do you mean by '(un-)suitable'? Analysing the diversity of social acceptance towards the deployment of renewable energies in different landscapes

  • Local energy transitions are shaped by diverse stakeholder perspec-tives on land use, reflecting competing values, knowledge systems,and political views. This study applies the landscape services frame-work to systematically assess renewable energy (RE) suitabilityacross different landscapes, capturing both ecological and socio-cultural dimensions. Through stakeholder surveys in two Germanregions and statistical comparative analysis, we reveal how suitabil-ity perceptions vary significantly: (1) between stakeholder groups(e.g. conservationists vs. developers), (2) across regions (industrialvs. ecological-cultural contexts), and (3) even within groups sharingsimilar objectives. Key findings show strong preference for REdevelopment in industrial and agricultural zones (‘acceptance cor-ridors’) and opposition in ecologically sensitive areas, though withnotable regional exceptions. The landscape services approachproves effective in mapping these conflicts and consensus areas,providingLocal energy transitions are shaped by diverse stakeholder perspec-tives on land use, reflecting competing values, knowledge systems,and political views. This study applies the landscape services frame-work to systematically assess renewable energy (RE) suitabilityacross different landscapes, capturing both ecological and socio-cultural dimensions. Through stakeholder surveys in two Germanregions and statistical comparative analysis, we reveal how suitabil-ity perceptions vary significantly: (1) between stakeholder groups(e.g. conservationists vs. developers), (2) across regions (industrialvs. ecological-cultural contexts), and (3) even within groups sharingsimilar objectives. Key findings show strong preference for REdevelopment in industrial and agricultural zones (‘acceptance cor-ridors’) and opposition in ecologically sensitive areas, though withnotable regional exceptions. The landscape services approachproves effective in mapping these conflicts and consensus areas,providing actionable insights for spatially sensitive RE planning. Ourresults underscore the need to complement technical siting criteriawith structured assessments of social landscape values to enablejust and locally accepted energy transitions.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Lukas GreßhakeORCiDGND, Stephan BoschORCiDGND, Robin Tutunaru, Uwe Holzhammer
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1220489
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/122048
ISSN:1747-4248OPAC
Parent Title (English):Journal of Land Use Science
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
Type:Article
Language:English
Date of Publication (online):2025/05/15
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/05/15
Volume:20
Issue:1
First Page:117
Last Page:150
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2025.2499280
Institutes:Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie
Fakultät für Angewandte Informatik / Institut für Geographie / Lehrstuhl für Humangeographie und Transformationsforschung
Dewey Decimal Classification:9 Geschichte und Geografie / 91 Geografie, Reisen / 910 Geografie, Reisen
Licence (German):CC-BY-NC 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell (mit Print on Demand)