The search result changed since you submitted your search request. Documents might be displayed in a different sort order.
  • search hit 14 of 7550
Back to Result List

Assessing genotype−phenotype correlations in colorectal cancer with deep learning: a multicentre cohort study

  • Background Deep learning-based models enable the prediction of molecular biomarkers from histopathology slides of colorectal cancer stained with haematoxylin and eosin; however, few studies have assessed prediction targets beyond microsatellite instability (MSI), BRAF, and KRAS systematically. We aimed to develop and validate a multi-target model based on deep learning for the simultaneous prediction of numerous genetic alterations and their associated phenotypes in colorectal cancer. Methods In this multicentre cohort study, tissue samples from patients with colorectal cancer were obtained by surgical resection and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. These samples were then digitised into whole-slide images and used to train and test a transformer-based deep learning algorithm for biomarker detection to simultaneously predict multiple genetic alterations and provide heatmap explanations. The primary dataset comprised 1376 patients from five cohorts who underwent comprehensiveBackground Deep learning-based models enable the prediction of molecular biomarkers from histopathology slides of colorectal cancer stained with haematoxylin and eosin; however, few studies have assessed prediction targets beyond microsatellite instability (MSI), BRAF, and KRAS systematically. We aimed to develop and validate a multi-target model based on deep learning for the simultaneous prediction of numerous genetic alterations and their associated phenotypes in colorectal cancer. Methods In this multicentre cohort study, tissue samples from patients with colorectal cancer were obtained by surgical resection and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. These samples were then digitised into whole-slide images and used to train and test a transformer-based deep learning algorithm for biomarker detection to simultaneously predict multiple genetic alterations and provide heatmap explanations. The primary dataset comprised 1376 patients from five cohorts who underwent comprehensive panel sequencing, with an additional 536 patients from two public datasets for validation. We compared the model's performance against conventional single-target models and examined the co-occurrence of alterations and shared morphology. Findings The multi-target model was able to predict numerous biomarkers from pathology slides, matching and partly exceeding single-target transformers. In the primary external validation cohorts, mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the multi-target transformer was 0·78 (SD 0·01) for BRAF, 0·88 (0·01) for hypermutation, 0·93 (0·01) for MSI, and 0·86 (0·01) for RNF43; predictive performance was consistent across metrics and supported by co-occurrence analyses. However, biomarkers with high AUROCs largely correlated with MSI, with model predictions depending considerably on morphology associated with MSI at pathological examination. Interpretation By use of morphology associated with MSI and more subtle biomarker-specific patterns within a shared phenotype, the multi-target transformers efficiently predicted biomarker status for diverse genetic alterations in colorectal cancer from slides stained with haematoxylin and eosin. These results highlight the importance of considering mutational co-occurrence and common morphology in biomarker research based on deep learning. Our validated and scalable model could support extension to other cancers and large, diverse cohorts, potentially facilitating cost-effective pre-screening and streamlined diagnostics in precision oncology.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Marco Gustav, Marko van Treeck, Nic G. ReitsamORCiDGND, Zunamys I. Carrero, Chiara M. L. Loeffler, Asier Rabasco Meneghetti, Bruno MärklORCiDGND, Lisa A. Boardman, Amy J. French, Ellen L. Goode, Andrea Gsur, Stefanie Brezina, Marc J. Gunter, Neil Murphy, Pia Hönscheid, Christian Sperling, Sebastian Foersch, Robert Steinfelder, Tabitha Harrison, Ulrike Peters, Amanda Phipps, Jakob Nikolas Kather
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1247964
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/124796
ISSN:2589-7500OPAC
Parent Title (English):The Lancet Digital Health
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Place of publication:Amsterdam
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2025
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2025/09/04
Volume:7
Issue:8
First Page:100891
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landig.2025.100891
Institutes:Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät / Universitätsklinikum
Medizinische Fakultät / Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine und Spezielle Pathologie
Dewey Decimal Classification:6 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften / 61 Medizin und Gesundheit / 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
Licence (German):License LogoCC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)