Fast approximation methods for credit portfolio risk calculations

  • Credit risk is one of the main risks financial institutions are exposed to. Within the last two decades, simulation-based credit portfolio models became extremely popular and replaced closed-form analytical ones as computers became more powerful. However, especially for non-homogenous and non-granular portfolios, a full simulation of a credit portfolio model is still time consuming, which can be disadvantageous within some use cases like credit pricing or within stress testing situations where results must be available very quickly. For this purpose, we investigate if methods based on artificial intelligence (AI) can be helpful to approximate a credit portfolio model. We compare the performance of AI-based methods within three different use cases with suitable non AI-based regression methods. As a result, we see that AI-based methods can generally capture portfolio characteristics and speed-up calculations but - depending on the specific use case and the availability of training data -Credit risk is one of the main risks financial institutions are exposed to. Within the last two decades, simulation-based credit portfolio models became extremely popular and replaced closed-form analytical ones as computers became more powerful. However, especially for non-homogenous and non-granular portfolios, a full simulation of a credit portfolio model is still time consuming, which can be disadvantageous within some use cases like credit pricing or within stress testing situations where results must be available very quickly. For this purpose, we investigate if methods based on artificial intelligence (AI) can be helpful to approximate a credit portfolio model. We compare the performance of AI-based methods within three different use cases with suitable non AI-based regression methods. As a result, we see that AI-based methods can generally capture portfolio characteristics and speed-up calculations but - depending on the specific use case and the availability of training data - they are not necessarily always the best choice. Particularly, considering the time and costs for collecting data and training of the complex algorithms, non-AI-based methods can be as good as or even better than AI-based ones, while requiring less computational effort.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Kevin Jakob, Johannes Churt, Matthias Fischer, Kim Nolte, Yarema OkhrinORCiDGND, Dirk Sondermann, Stefan Wilke, Thomas Worbs
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1097909
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/109790
ISSN:2524-6984OPAC
ISSN:2524-6186OPAC
Parent Title (English):Digital Finance
Publisher:Springer
Place of publication:Berlin
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2023
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2023/12/06
Volume:5
First Page:689
Last Page:716
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-023-00097-7
Institutes:Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Statistik und mathematische Wirtschaftstheorie
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät / Institut für Statistik und mathematische Wirtschaftstheorie / Lehrstuhl für Statistik
Dewey Decimal Classification:3 Sozialwissenschaften / 33 Wirtschaft / 330 Wirtschaft
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)