Resampling-based confidence intervals and bands for the average treatment effect in observational studies with competing risks

  • The g-formula can be used to estimate the treatment effect while accounting for confounding bias in observational studies. With regard to time-to-event endpoints, possibly subject to competing risks, the construction of valid pointwise confidence intervals and time-simultaneous confidence bands for the causal risk difference is complicated, however. A convenient solution is to approximate the asymptotic distribution of the corresponding stochastic process by means of resampling approaches. In this paper, we consider three different resampling methods, namely the classical nonparametric bootstrap, the influence function equipped with a resampling approach as well as a martingale-based bootstrap version, the so-called wild bootstrap. For the latter, three sub-versions based on differing distributions of the underlying random multipliers are examined. We set up a simulation study to compare the accuracy of the different techniques, which reveals that the wild bootstrap should in generalThe g-formula can be used to estimate the treatment effect while accounting for confounding bias in observational studies. With regard to time-to-event endpoints, possibly subject to competing risks, the construction of valid pointwise confidence intervals and time-simultaneous confidence bands for the causal risk difference is complicated, however. A convenient solution is to approximate the asymptotic distribution of the corresponding stochastic process by means of resampling approaches. In this paper, we consider three different resampling methods, namely the classical nonparametric bootstrap, the influence function equipped with a resampling approach as well as a martingale-based bootstrap version, the so-called wild bootstrap. For the latter, three sub-versions based on differing distributions of the underlying random multipliers are examined. We set up a simulation study to compare the accuracy of the different techniques, which reveals that the wild bootstrap should in general be preferred if the sample size is moderate and sufficient data on the event of interest have been accrued. For illustration, the resampling methods are further applied to data on the long-term survival in patients with early-stage Hodgkin’s disease.show moreshow less

Download full text files

Export metadata

Statistics

Number of document requests

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Jasmin RühlORCiDGND, Sarah FriedrichORCiDGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:384-opus4-1124301
Frontdoor URLhttps://opus.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/opus4/112430
ISSN:0960-3174OPAC
ISSN:1573-1375OPAC
Parent Title (English):Statistics and Computing
Publisher:Springer
Place of publication:Berlin
Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2024
Publishing Institution:Universität Augsburg
Release Date:2024/04/05
Tag:Computational Theory and Mathematics; Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Statistics and Probability; Theoretical Computer Science
Volume:34
Issue:3
First Page:101
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-024-10420-w
Institutes:Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultät
Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultät / Institut für Mathematik
Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultät / Institut für Mathematik / Lehrstuhl für Mathematical Statistics and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:5 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik / 51 Mathematik / 510 Mathematik
Licence (German):CC-BY 4.0: Creative Commons: Namensnennung (mit Print on Demand)